A David Brown
-
New Look for IHEC Blog!
[Education] (International Higher Education Consulting Blog™)Recently I spent a few minutes changing the look and feel of IHEC Blog. I liked the previous look and feel but after three years in operation I thought it was time for a change! There are still some bugs to be worked out but I think I like the new layout and colors and in particular, light blue on brown! From time to time you may notice small changes but hopefully they will be small enough that you won't even notice. I would love to hear your thoughts on the new design! Please feel free to ...
Recently I spent a few minutes changing the look and feel of IHEC Blog. I liked the previous look and feel but after three years in operation I thought it was time for a change! There are still some bugs to be worked out but I think I like the new layout and colors and in particular, light blue on brown! From time to time you may notice small changes but hopefully they will be small enough that you won't even notice. I would love to hear your thoughts on the new design! Please feel free to leave a comment if you have a moment.
Photo credit: David Reece -
Organic Valley Farmer-Owners Receive Outstanding Quality Awards
[Social Entrepreneurship, Corporate Responsibility] (CSRwire Press Releases, Events and Reports)Organic Valley Family of Farms, America's largest cooperative of family farms and one of the nation's leading organic brands, recently recognized 396 of its farmer-owners, nearly 24 percent of its total members, with quality awards. Organized in 1988, Organic Valley represents 1,652 farmers in 33 states and four Canadian provinces with the mission of saving family farms through organic farming. Approximately 300 of its farmer-owners descended upon La Crosse, Wis., last week to attend their ann ...
Organic Valley Family of Farms, America's largest cooperative of family farms and one of the nation's leading organic brands, recently recognized 396 of its farmer-owners, nearly 24 percent of its total members, with quality awards. Organized in 1988, Organic Valley represents 1,652 farmers in 33 states and four Canadian provinces with the mission of saving family farms through organic farming. Approximately 300 of its farmer-owners descended upon La Crosse, Wis., last week to attend their annual meeting to discuss the cooperative’s current direction, issues and goals for the year ahead. Organic Valley dairy, produce, soy, egg, juice and feed crop farmers and Organic Prairie beef, poultry and pork farmers were recognized for 2009 quality achievements during an awards banquet on Friday of the annual meeting. Organic Valley honored its dairy farmers in Gold, Silver and Milk Quality Recognition categories. To achieve these honors, Gold Award recipients needed an average Somatic Cell Count (SCC) of less than 150,000; Silver Award recipients an average SCC between 151,000 and 200,000; and Milk Quality Recognition recipients an average SCC between 201,000 and 250,000. In addition, all levels had to achieve a Standard Plate Count average below 25 and a Preliminary Incubation Count averaging less than 30. All of the gold and silver winners received a plaque and the quality recognition winners received certificates for their accomplishments. The following farmers received the top milk quality Gold Award, the "Cream of the CROPP," in each region:- Eastern Region: Meyer Family, North Hardwick Dairy LLC, Hardwick, Vt.
- Midwest Region: Kevin and Mary Jahnke, Jahnke Family Farm Limited Partnership, Lancaster, Wis.
- Western Region: Greg and Marci Bingham, Bingham Farms, Weston, Idaho
- Midwest Region Omega-3: Michael Miller, M&M; Organic Farms, Wonewoc, Wis.
- Midwest Region: Chuck Voehl, Voehlganic Farm, Westby, Wis.
- East Region: Aaron Lapp, Allenwood, Penn.
- Kalona (Iowa) Pool: Marcus and Grace Kauffman, Kalona, Iowa
-
Vince Cable hailed as winner of election TV debate
[Guardian] (Politics: Liberal Democrats | guardian.co.uk)King Vince, the man who predicted the recession, wins the most laughs and biggest applause in Channel 4's Chancellors' debateSo who won and were there any knock out blows? The consensus tonight, at Westminster and in the Twittersphere, is that "King Vince" was the runaway winner of the first major televised debate of the general election campaign.Vince Cable won the biggest laughs and the most applause as he tweaked both Alistair Darling and George Osborne in the Chancellors' Debate on Channel 4 ...
King Vince, the man who predicted the recession, wins the most laughs and biggest applause in Channel 4's Chancellors' debate
So who won and were there any knock out blows? The consensus tonight, at Westminster and in the Twittersphere, is that "King Vince" was the runaway winner of the first major televised debate of the general election campaign.
Vince Cable won the biggest laughs and the most applause as he tweaked both Alistair Darling and George Osborne in the Chancellors' Debate on Channel 4. Perhaps his finest moment came in his closing statement when Cable said:
The Labour government led us into this mess. They have done severe damage to pensions and savings, they have wasted a vast amount of money on over-centralised public services.
The Tories presided over two big recessions in office, they wasted most of the North Sea oil revenue, they sold off the family silver on the cheap. Now they want to have another turn to get their noses in the trough and reward their rich backers.
The Liberal Democrats are different. We got this crisis basically right. We are not beholden to either the super rich or militant unions.
Osborne dismissed the Lib Dems as irrelevant:
You have a choice. With the greatest respect to Vince there is not going to be a Liberal Democrat government after the next election. There is either going to be a Conservative government or a Labour government.
Osborne is, of course, right that the Lib Dems are not going to win the election. But Cable's performance tonight shows that the Lib Dems are going to be a powerful force in this election campaign.
Labour and Tory strategists are both scratching their heads working out what impact the Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg will have on the biggest event of this election -- the three television debates between the main party leaders. They are asking whether Clegg will:
• Tack to the middle and cast himself as the reasonable man in contrast to Gordon Brown and David Cameron.
• Attack both Brown and Cameron but indicate that his heart lies more on the centre left.
Labour believes that if Clegg goes for the former, he may not change the dyanimcs of the campaign. They hope that if Clegg goes for the latter, Cameron may look isolated.
Judging by Cable's performance tonight, it looks like the Lib Dems want to attack both parties. But on the big picture they remain closer to Labour. This is what Cable said tonight about the Tory plans to cut national insurance contributions -- to be financed by new efficiency savings in government spending:
George, last week you went round denouncing these government supposed savings as complete fiction – which apparently a lot of them are. You are now using these fictional savings to finance your tax cuts. That is utterly incredible.
Britain's third party has not been taken seriously in a general election since the 1980s when it looked like the SDP / Liberal Alliance might hold the balance of power. The Lib Dems are in a similar position again in a wholly different election campaign where they are giving the big parties a headache.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Alistair Darling turns hard man but Vince Cable gets all the laughs | Larry Elliott
[Guardian] (Politics: Liberal Democrats | guardian.co.uk)Make no mistake, this was the moment the bell rang for the start of the fight. And it was Osborne who was under the most pressureWho would have thought it? Alistair Darling has been the occupant of 11 Downing Street during the biggest economic bust in Britain's postwar history, yet it was George Osborne who had it all to prove in last night's debate.All things considered, the shadow chancellor didn't do badly. Sure Osborne looked pleased with himself, as he always does, but he made Darling admit ...
Make no mistake, this was the moment the bell rang for the start of the fight. And it was Osborne who was under the most pressure
Who would have thought it? Alistair Darling has been the occupant of 11 Downing Street during the biggest economic bust in Britain's postwar history, yet it was George Osborne who had it all to prove in last night's debate.
All things considered, the shadow chancellor didn't do badly. Sure Osborne looked pleased with himself, as he always does, but he made Darling admit that Labour was dropping the idea of a "death tax" to pay for long term care, and fess up to nicking the Conservative plan to raise the threshold on stamp duty in last week's budget.
Not that the youngest of the three men who would be chancellor had it all his own way. He had his own spells of wriggling when put under concerted pressure over the latest attempt by David Cameron to reverse the Conservative slide in the opinion polls – lower national insurance contributions.
It was, if you get your kicks out of re-regulating the banks or the right time to tackle the deficit, rattling good fun, even though Darling, Cable and Osborne all appeared to be dressed for a reunion of undertakers. The sombre attire, presumably, was to show how all three took the challenge of cutting the budget deficit. But, apart from Darling's backtracking on the death tax, there were no bombshells and little to stop the apathetic voter switching to Coronation Street, EastEnders or Raymond Blanc's kitchen secrets.
There may be many more times in the next five weeks when the viewers grope down the back of the sofa for the remote, for this – rather than the moment Gordon Brown goes to the Palace to see the Queen – was the moment the bell rang for the start of the fight.
And it was Osborne who was under the most pressure to deliver.
After a shaky start to the crisis,Darling has had a good war and is close to attaining national treasure status. Vince Cable, one of the few at Westminster to have warned in advance of debt-fuelled consumerism, has already been elevated to that status. And Darling and Cable were quickly on the attack. After a bit of shadow boxing in which they and Osborne bragged about their credentials to do the job – tenacity (Darling), energy (Osborne), getting it right (Cable) – the debate quickly turned to the shadow chancellor's planned cut in national insurance contributions.
Darling dropped his normal rope-a-dope approach and came on aggressively, warning that Conservative plans for immediate spending cuts risked "tipping us back into recession". Cable, who had all the night's best soundbites ("pin-striped Scargills" to describe the bankers being the best of them) and got nearly all the laughs from the carefully vetted Channel 4 studio audience, said the proposed war on waste that Osborne claimed would pay for lower NICs was fictional. The Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman wasted no opportunity to remind the audience of his foresight, and came across as just a tad smug.
Osborne went for the populist approach. Voters knew from their own experience that the "sooner you deal with a debt problem, the better", the shadow chancellor said. "We need to cut wasteful government spending instead of increasing national insurance taxes on hardworking people," he added. That may go down well on the doorsteps in the coming weeks, but it is economic nonsense. If the government cuts spending when households are tightening their belts, it simply leads to lower demand and a longer, deeper recession, as Darling, in one of his better interventions, pointed out.
The chancellor's team got in some early spin, saying that preparing for the budget meant their man was under-cooked. He looked it, stumbling over his lines at times and looking uncharacteristically nervous.
The dog that didn't bark was VAT. Pressed to rule out higher VAT, Darling and Osborne used the traditional formula that they had no plans to raise the tax. But that was what Margaret Thatcher said before the 1979 election. She raised it six weeks after polling day.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Letters: Co-operative approach to football could pay dividends
[Guardian] (The Guardian newspaper: Editorials & reply | guardian.co.uk)The news that football fans could get the opportunity to buy their clubs under radical Labour plans is fantastic and something we have been campaigning for (No 10 plan to fix football, 29 March). A recent survey by YouGov revealed that across the country 56% of fans felt their club would be in better hands if it was owned co-operatively. Not surprisingly, 83% of Manchester United fans and 72% of Liverpool fans feel the same way. The British game has borrowed many tactics from foreign teams, so i ...
The news that football fans could get the opportunity to buy their clubs under radical Labour plans is fantastic and something we have been campaigning for (No 10 plan to fix football, 29 March). A recent survey by YouGov revealed that across the country 56% of fans felt their club would be in better hands if it was owned co-operatively. Not surprisingly, 83% of Manchester United fans and 72% of Liverpool fans feel the same way. The British game has borrowed many tactics from foreign teams, so it is only logical that we follow the example of one of the most successful foreign teams – FC Barcelona – and use the co-operative idea of the fans owning the team.
Ed Mayo
Secretary general, Co-operatives UK
• First it is announced in the budget that Labour will mutualise British Waterways. Now Labour is mutualising a quarter of the shares in football clubs to give fans a bigger say. Is Labour on the brink of publishing a manifesto which promises a revolution in ownership? The mutual model can be applied to all kinds of companies and institutions, from your local swimming pool and park, to disused land owned by the NHS or MoD, to post offices and pubs. In a mutual organisation people learn the building blocks of democracy. Mutuals can point the way to a stronger society and fairer economy.
Paul Richards
Eastbourne, East Sussex
• Labour's plan to give clubs back to fans is not only a brilliant vote winner, but an issue which will engage many to use their vote. Football clubs are exactly that, clubs, not plcs or collateral for leveraged buyouts. It is also another lesson for banks, who preferred to lend to owners who merely use a football club as means to earn a fast buck. There should also be a requirement to transform any debt into equity reserved for fan based co-ops.
Steve Downing
Liverpool
• While not generally a supporter of Gordon Brown, I must warmly congratulate him on his proposals to regulate football finances and give fans a greater share of the action. These will help to restore football to its grassroots and the community where it rightfully belongs. The devil will be in the detail and it will be interesting to see the content of the proposals and how soon they will be implemented; or whether, as claimed by David Cameron, they will turn out to be just a gimmick to win votes.
Professor Ian Blackshaw
International Sports Law Centre, The Hague, Netherlands
• How pleasing to note that No 10 has a plan to give clubs back to the fans. Can we assume that they have a similar plan to give back to the people the railways, the power companies, the utility companies and the other pieces of the family silver sold off?
Brian Matthews
Wrexham, Clwyd
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Tony Blair returns to give masterclass in how to 'take Tories apart' | Nicholas Watt
[Guardian] (Politics: Labour | guardian.co.uk)Former prime minister returns to the political fray to criticise David Cameron for offering 'vacuous' change "So guys, was that OK?" Tony Blair will probably mutter to his old friends in the Sedgefield Labour party. "Boy, that most certainly was OK," they will reply.What they probably don't realise in the Trimdon Labour Club is that two people will have been mesmerised – and a little frightened – by Blair's performance. David Cameron and George Osborne, who always regarded Blair as unbeatabl ...
Former prime minister returns to the political fray to criticise David Cameron for offering 'vacuous' change
"So guys, was that OK?" Tony Blair will probably mutter to his old friends in the Sedgefield Labour party. "Boy, that most certainly was OK," they will reply.
What they probably don't realise in the Trimdon Labour Club is that two people will have been mesmerised – and a little frightened – by Blair's performance. David Cameron and George Osborne, who always regarded Blair as unbeatable, will see his speech as the most effective attack on them in nearly four years.
And when was the last time the Tories were subjected to such a forensic dissection of their values, policies and approach? That would of course have been Blair's last speech as Labour leader to the party conference in Manchester in 2006.
This was Blair's most famous line:
If we can't take this lot apart in the next few years we shouldn't be in the business of politics at all.
These are the reasons why Cameron and Osborne will have been rattled by Blair's speech and mightily relieved he is no longer around. Blair identified the following Tory weaknesses:
• The main Tory mantra, echoing Barack Obama, of time for a change:
As I always used to say when some in our ranks urged a mantra of "time for a change" in 1997, it is the most vacuous slogan in politics. "Time for a change" begs the question: change to what exactly? And the reason an election that seemed certain to some in its outcome is now in sharp contention lies precisely in that question.
• There is a "puzzle" about where the Tories lie on the big policies:
When it comes to the big policy issues, there is a puzzle, that has turned into a problem, that has now become a long, hard pause for thought: where are they centred? Is there a core? Think of all the phrases you associate with their leadership and the phrase "you know where you are with them" is about the last description you would think of.
• A lack of consistency, in contrast to New Labour, which offered "clear and mutually coherent" positions in the run-up to 1997:
On Europe, they've gone right when they should have gone centre. On law and order, they've gone liberal when actually they should have stuck with a traditional Conservative position. And on the economy they seem to be buffeted this way and that, depending less on where they think the country should be, than on where they think public opinion might be.
Or on economic policy, one week the absolute priority is deficit reduction. OK, again clear. But yesterday a big tax cut became the centrepiece, and not a vague "when things are better" aspiration but a full-on pledge.
Leave aside for a minute the rights and wrongs of the policies. What can't be left aside is that they are plainly diametrically opposite. So why the confusion?So awe and admiration at Tory HQ. And in Downing Street? Gratitude. But maybe the thought that the person really in Blair's sights was Gordon Brown. Remember the quote from 2006: Labour shouldn't bother if it can't take the Tories apart.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Tony Blair throws himself into election campaign with praise for Gordon Brown and harsh words for Tories
[Guardian] (Politics: Labour | guardian.co.uk)'Time for a change' if the voters do not know what change will bring, former prime minister saysTony Blair hailed Gordon Brown's leadership today, praising his successor as prime minister for setting the country on the road to recovery after the financial crisis.In his first intervention into the pre-election fray, Blair declared he was "optimistic" about the prospects for the future under Labour.Speaking to activists in his former constituency in Sedgefield, County Durham, the former prime mini ...
'Time for a change' if the voters do not know what change will bring, former prime minister says
Tony Blair hailed Gordon Brown's leadership today, praising his successor as prime minister for setting the country on the road to recovery after the financial crisis.
In his first intervention into the pre-election fray, Blair declared he was "optimistic" about the prospects for the future under Labour.
Speaking to activists in his former constituency in Sedgefield, County Durham, the former prime minister hit out at David Cameron, dismissing the Conservative leader's "time for change" slogan as "the most vacuous in politics".
Blair said that while Britain was not yet "out of the woods" following the financial crisis, it was "on the path out" as a result of the actions taken by Brown.
"At the moment of peril the world acted. Britain acted. The decision to act required experience, judgment and boldness. It required leadership. Gordon Brown supplied it," he said.
Blair acknowledged that it would be a "big thing" for Labour to win a fourth successive general election – something the party had never achieved before.
However, he said that as voters began looking more closely at what the Tories were offering the race was narrowing.
"The tough thing about being in government, especially as time marches on, is that the disappointments accumulate, the public becomes less inclined to give the benefit of the doubt, the call for 'a time to change' becomes easier to make, the prospect of change becomes more attractive," he said.
"But, as I always used to say when some in our ranks urged a mantra of 'time for a change' in 1997, it is the most vacuous slogan in politics.
"'Time for a change' begs the question: change to what exactly? And the reason an election that seemed certain to some in its outcome is now in sharp contention lies precisely in that question."
He said that, when it came to the big policy issues, there was a "puzzle" over what the Conservatives stood for.
"Think of all the phrases you associate with their leadership and the phrase 'you know where you are with them' is about the last description you would think of," he said.
"They seem like they haven't made up their mind about where they stand, and so the British public finds it hard to make up its mind about where it stands. In uncertain times, there is a lot to be said for certain leadership.
"What happens after a long period of one party in government is this: the flipside of change being attractive is that the public put a question mark over the party seeking to be the change.
"It is not a cynical question mark. It is not loaded. It's just a simple inquiry: what is it that I am getting?"
Blair said that in the run-up to the 1997 general election, as he and Brown had set out New Labour's positions across a range of policies, the question marks over what they stood for had faded.
In contrast, he said, the question mark over the Tories had "gone into bolder print".
"They look like they're either the old Tory party but want to hide it or they're not certain which way to go. But either is not good news," he said.
"On Europe, they've gone right when they should have gone centre. On law and order, they've gone liberal when actually they should have stuck with a traditional Conservative position. And on the economy they seem to be buffeted this way and that, depending less on where they think the country should be than on where they think public opinion might be."
He highlighted what he said was the "confusion" over the Tories' position on the economy, with the party saying one week that cutting the deficit was the absolute priority, and then the next offering a big tax cut as the centrepiece of its policy.
"The benign but still disqualifying explanation is that the policymakers are confused, not just the policies," he said.
"The less benign one is that one set of policies represents what they believe in; the other, what they think they have to say to win. That's not a confusion, actually – that's a strategy, and the British people deserve to have that strategy exposed before polling day."
In contrast, he said that Labour had mapped out a clear way forward.
"It is consistent. It is solid. It matches a strong commitment to public services with a strong commitment to reform," he said.
"It is clear on crime. The economic policy is measured and set out by the steady hand of Alistair Darling [the chancellor]. The package is coherent and thought through."
Brown welcomed Blair throwing himself into the pre-election race.
He said: "I welcome Tony Blair campaigning and I welcome him saying that there is a real risk, a real danger, a real threat from the Conservative party.
"I ask people to take a second look at Labour but to take a hard, long look at the Conservative risk and the Conservative threat, and what they would do to ordinary families in our country."
The prime minister added: "I think Tony Blair wants to explain, like so many other people in our country, the risk of a Conservative government. That it's got a choice now at the election and people can make their choice.
"They've got to know that the Tory party would take away the guarantees for cancer care, they'll take away the guarantees for tuition being available in schools.
"They'll take away the child tax credits from middle-class families, they'll take away the child trust funds. People need to know that the choice means that we will sustain the recovery out of recession, the Conservatives would wreck the recovery."
Cameron said he was "not at all" worried about Blair's entry to the campaign, joking: "It is nice to see him making a speech that no one is paying for."
Blair has been able to command huge fees as one of the stars of the global speaking circuit since leaving office.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Blair on the hustings? Coherent and on-message | Lance Price
[Guardian] (Politics: Labour | guardian.co.uk)The reappearance of Labour's ex-leader wasn't scary but helpful – and proof once again of an enduring ability to survive sleazeA tanned and relaxed Tony Blair returned to the domestic political scene today to do what he does best. Former leaders can be a mixed blessing to an election campaign – the reappearance of Lady Thatcher periodically sent shivers down the spine of Tory strategists – but Blair did his successor a service.He didn't mention Gordon Brown often, speaking of his hope for ...
The reappearance of Labour's ex-leader wasn't scary but helpful – and proof once again of an enduring ability to survive sleaze
A tanned and relaxed Tony Blair returned to the domestic political scene today to do what he does best. Former leaders can be a mixed blessing to an election campaign – the reappearance of Lady Thatcher periodically sent shivers down the spine of Tory strategists – but Blair did his successor a service.
He didn't mention Gordon Brown often, speaking of his hope for a fourth term Labour government rather than the first Brown mandate – but when he did, he was wholly supportive. He didn't mention Iraq either, other than one glancing reference to Basra. He was an on-message as the party's election planners could have hoped.
Given what we think we know about his private views on Brown, he has repaid his once troublesome chancellor with more loyalty than many former Blairites.
It wasn't a barnstorming performance of the kind that might have eclipsed Brown, but instead something more helpful. It was an argument. The coming weeks will be replete with slogans and soundbites and, of course, Blair was once the master of both. But he has a more important talent: the ability to take his listeners through a coherent explanation for why Labour is better placed politically to take the country forward.
There are those who will never listen to a word he says again and those who would take out their diaries to check if he told them today was Tuesday. Yet those who were listening will have heard a coherent case for why David Cameron has failed to match Labour's pre-1997 success.
"Time for a change", he said, was the most vacuous slogan in politics. And the cynics will be quick to argue that if anybody should be able to recognise vacuity it is Blair. But in truth, whether you supported Blair or not, you knew where he stood. With Cameron you don't. And with Brown? Blair didn't exactly say, but I suspect he'd argue privately that while it took the prime minister a painfully long time to work out what he wanted to do with the job, he got there in the end.
Tony Blair clearly has the survival gene. Iraq could have destroyed him – it didn't. Disillusion with spin and sleaze could have wrecked his reputation – but he can still command an audience. Even his hair, which many of us didn't expect to survive one term, never mind three, is still more or less intact.
Blair haters will have been enraged by his reappearance. And Labour's media managers scored an own goal by unsurreptitiously booting out the journalists and cutting the TV feed before questions were allowed. He'll be used judiciously in the coming campaign, but judging by today's performance he is not going to embarrass the party. He has been quoted as telling "friends" that he doesn't think Brown can beat Cameron, but he clearly thinks he deserves to.
Labour has decided to fight the election offering cautious optimism about Britain's prospects compared to the Tories' negativism. In that context, Blair the eternal optimist is surely an asset. "The British economy has defied predictions," he said. It is now for Gordon Brown to prove that Labour can do the same.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Vince Cable shows how 'Yah-boo politics' can win victories for the LibDems
[Speaking] (Max Atkinson's Blog)I've just been watching last night's Channel 4 broadcast of the Chancellors' Debate, and was fascinated to see that Vince Cable was the only one of the three spokesmen who prompted applause from the audience during his closing statement (see transcript & video clip below). A victory for 'Yah-boo' politics It proved something I've always argued, namely that 'Yah-boo' politics works just as well for the LibDems as it does for the other main parties - in spite of the LibDems' long-standing 'hol ...
I've just been watching last night's Channel 4 broadcast of the Chancellors' Debate, and was fascinated to see that Vince Cable was the only one of the three spokesmen who prompted applause from the audience during his closing statement (see transcript & video clip below).
A victory for 'Yah-boo' politics
It proved something I've always argued, namely that 'Yah-boo' politics works just as well for the LibDems as it does for the other main parties - in spite of the LibDems' long-standing 'holier than thou' claim to be the only party that doesn't lower itself to using 'Yah-boo' tactics.
During Paddy Ashdown's leadership of the party, I often found myself arguing against such an approach, for the simple reason that we knew that 84% of the bursts of applause in political speeches are triggered by two particular types of message (or a combination of the two):
Boasts about our side: 40%
Attacks or insults aimed at opponents: 34%Combined boast + attack: 10%(Our Masters' Voices, pp. 34-45).
So, if you're really serious about refraining from 'yah-boo' politics, you're voluntarily reducing your chances of winning applause by more than a third.
Liberal 'Yah-boo' moments from the pastThis is not to say, of course, that the LibDems have always (or ever?) been consistent in practising what they preach when it comes to avoiding 'Yah-boo' politics.
After all, Vince Cable's most famous line during his temporary leadership of the party was his 'Yah-boo' remark about Gordon Brown becoming more like Mr Bean than Stalin.
More than 30 years ago, during the 1979 general election, Liberal leader David Steel was also not averse to it, as you can see from this neat example of how to use a puzzle with contrasting solution to say 'yah-b00' to both the other parties at the same time:
[PUZZLE] 'There are two Conservative parties in this election.[SOLUTION][A] 'One is offering the continuation of the policies we've had for the last five years.[B] 'And the other is offering a return to the policies of forty years ago.'[APPLAUSE]
Cable's latest 'Yah-boo' momentIn his closing remarks at the end of last night's debate, Vince Cable again showed how to use this 'plague on both your houses' approach to craft a 'Yah-boo' sequence that wins a positive response from the audience.
As with the Steel example from 1979, it showed that a rhetorical advantage for LibDem politicians is that there is always plenty of scope for making simple contrasts between the two main parties - and, in this case, Cable adds to the rhetorical impact of that by listing three dreadful things that each of them is alleged to have done - all of which are offered as the start of a solution to the puzzle with which he opened the sequence.
Then, as he moves towards making a favourable contrast between the LibDem's and both the alternatives, he's interrupted by one of the evening's few bursts of applause:
[PUZZLE] 'The question is who can you trust to do it?
[SOLUTION][A1] 'The Labour government led us into this mess[A2] 'they've done severe damage to pensions and savings[A3] 'they've wasted a vast amount of money on over-centralised public services.
[B1] 'The Tories presided over two big recessions in office[B2] 'they wasted most of the North Sea oil revenue[B3] 'they sold off the family silver on the cheap
'Now they want to have another turn to get their noses in the trough and reward their rich backers.
'I- I - The Liberal Democrats are different..'
[APPLAUSE]
'.. the Liberal Democrats are different.'
-
At White House Seder: Gefilte Fish, Brisket and a Host of Familiar Faces
[Politics] (Politics Daily)Filed under: The Daily FLOTUS with Lynn Sweet Why was Monday night different from all the other nights in the White House? For the second year, the Obama family night hosted a seder in the White House, with gefilte fish, tzimmes, kugel, matzo ball soup and brisket, I'm told (entire menu at the end of the column). The seder -- marking the first night of Passover -- was in the Old Family Dining Room and, like last year, the group used the no-frills Maxwell House haggadah--the Seder guide-- ...
Filed under: The Daily FLOTUS with Lynn Sweet
Why was Monday night different from all the other nights in the White House?
For the second year, the Obama family night hosted a seder in the White House, with gefilte fish, tzimmes, kugel, matzo ball soup and brisket, I'm told (entire menu at the end of the column). The seder -- marking the first night of Passover -- was in the Old Family Dining Room and, like last year, the group used the no-frills Maxwell House haggadah--the Seder guide-- named after the coffee maker.
The seder started at about 6:30 and ran approximately two hours, and many of the participants remembered when a small group of Obama presidential campaign staffers threw together a seder in a hotel in Harrisburg, Pa., in 2008. Eric Lesser, then the campaign's chief baggage wrangler (and now an assistant to White House senior adviser David Axelrod) organized the hotel seder because Passover that year came during the hotly contested Pennsylvania primary and staffers did not have time to go home for the holiday.
Lesser got hold of a seder "kit" from the Hillel at the University of Pennsylvania -- complete with the haggadah -- and as Jewish and non-Jewish staffers gathered, then Democratic White House hopeful Barack Obama dropped in to join the group, as did Valerie Jarrett, now a White House senior adviser, and pal Eric Whitaker, a University of Chicago Medical Center executive.
The seder comes with a bonus: Because it is clearly a private, personal affair with longtime staffers and their families, the Obama White House avoids having leaders of different U.S. Jewish groups feel slighted that they were not invited.
In 2009, the White House seder was on the second night of Passover. Obama sat at the head of the long table in the Old Family Dining Room. Most of the Harrisburg group was there, as were other staffers. The Obama daughters, Malia and Sasha, found the afikomen -- the hidden matzo.
This year, the seder was on the first night of Passover. Obama sat in the middle of the table, not at the head. Many of the same Harrisburg core group were there again -- Lesser, with his mother, Joan (last year he brought his father, Martin); Arun Chaudhary, videographer for the campaign and now the White House; Samantha Tubman, a campaign press assistant and now a deputy in the White House social secretary's office; and Jen Psaki, then traveling press secretary and now the White House deputy communications chief.Folks passed along to the White House chefs their favorite recipes: Susan Sher, Mrs. Obama's chief of staff and White House liaison to the Jewish community, sent along a recipe for a Passover noodle kugel that came from Jeanne Steiner, her sister. Mrs. Lesser shared her carrot soufflé recipe, and Herbie Ziskend, a campaign staffer now with Vice President Biden's operation, offered his recipe for charoses.
I'm told by one of the participants that the seder was festive and had all the traditional elements: "It went the way most seders do. We read the Maxwell House haggadah and did four questions, sang Dayenu, made Hillel sandwiches and searched for afikomen. We concluded with the cup for Elijah and singing 'Eliyahu Hanavi.'
"It was a meaningful way to mark the holiday with co-workers who have become close friends, and to reflect on all that has happened since the first seder in Harrisburg. And the matzo balls were pretty good, too!"
The White House released a photo of the seder, above. From right to left, it's Psaki, President Obama, Lisa Kohnke (deputy director of White House advance), Lesser, Joan Lesser, and Joanna Cohen, Sher's step-daughter.
I obtained the menu of the Obama White House 2010 seder. Here it is:
Gefilte FishCharosesChicken Soup with Matzo BallsBraised Beef BrisketChicken RoastSweet Potato-Carrot TzimmesCarrot SouffleKugelSpring AsparagusFlourless Chocolate CakeGolden Apricot CakeBrown Sugar Macaroons -
Pau Gasol, quasi-surgeon, miracle worker and organ donor
[NBA Basketball, Sports] (ESPN.com - TrueHoop)In Sports Illustrated, Lee Jenkins profiles Pau Gasol, who is fascinating. The article proves the Laker big man really can play many different roles: At Children's Hospital he met with doctors in a conference room, quizzing them about their treatment of patients with scoliosis, asking how they ensure that their procedures do not stunt lung development. "We all looked at each other like, How does he know this stuff?" says Dr. David Skaggs, chief of orthopedic surgery. Next month Gasol is schedu ...
In Sports Illustrated, Lee Jenkins profiles Pau Gasol, who is fascinating. The article proves the Laker big man really can play many different roles:
- At Children's Hospital he met with doctors in a conference room, quizzing them about their treatment of patients with scoliosis, asking how they ensure that their procedures do not stunt lung development. "We all looked at each other like, How does he know this stuff?" says Dr. David Skaggs, chief of orthopedic surgery. Next month Gasol is scheduled to sit in on a spinal surgery with Skaggs, dressed in scrubs. "We talk to him now almost like he is a surgical colleague," Skaggs says.
- The morning after the deal the Lakers met in the lobby of their Toronto hotel to catch a bus, and trainer Chip Schaefer rubbed his eyes. "I had the strangest dream last night," he said. "I dreamt we traded Kwame Brown for Pau Gasol."
- Pau glides around opponents; Marc charges through them. Pau goes to art house theaters; Marc goes fishing. Pau debates; Marc scraps. "They have totally different mentalities," says Grizzlies coach Lionel Hollins. Yet Marc talks to Pau at least every other day and lives in Pau's old condo in downtown Memphis. "Little brothers have to go their own way sometimes," Marc says. "But Pau has always been the best example for me to follow." The Grizzlies have morphed from 60-game losers to playoff contenders, not in spite of the trade -- the only time in league history that one brother was traded for another -- but because of it. "Pau has been like an NBA organ donor for us," says [Chris] Wallace, who turned the draft picks and cap space and other spare parts from Los Angeles into nine players on the current roster.
-
YouTube Used in U.K. Vote as Parties Follow Obama (Update1)
[BusinessWeek] (BusinessWeek.com --)Gordon Brown and David Cameron’s campaigns are taking a leaf out of Barack Obama’s book.
Gordon Brown and David Cameron’s campaigns are taking a leaf out of Barack Obama’s book. -
Axelrod: HC Passed Because GOP Let Its Guard Down
[Politics] (RealClearPolitics - Homepage)Sam Stein, Huff Post One of the president's closest advisers said on Tuesday that Republican opponents of health care reform let down their guard following Sen. Scott Brown's election in Massachusetts, in the process allowing Democrats and the administration to make a final, successful push for the bill.In an interview with the Huffington Post hours after the president signed health care reform into law, senior adviser David Axelrod pointed to that special election in late January as a ...
Sam Stein, Huff Post
One of the president's closest advisers said on Tuesday that Republican opponents of health care reform let down their guard following Sen. Scott Brown's election in Massachusetts, in the process allowing Democrats and the administration to make a final, successful push for the bill.In an interview with the Huffington Post hours after the president signed health care reform into law, senior adviser David Axelrod pointed to that special election in late January as a pivotal point in the long path to passing legislation."Some of the steam went out of the opposition after... -
UFC 111 Preview: Jim Miller Faces Serious Ground Threat in Mark Bocek
[Mixed Martial Arts] (Bloody Elbow)The first battle on the UFC 111 main card will feature a lightweight tussle between New Jersey-native Jim Miller (16-2, 5-1 UFC) and Canadian-born Brazilian jiu-jitsu black belt Mark Bocek (8-2, 4-2 UFC) in what could turn out to be an appealing match-up for those fans drawn to the technical aspects of mixed martial arts. Miller enters the contest riding a three-fight win streak with victories over Mac Danzig, Duane Ludwig, and Steve Lopez. Bocek has also had some success as he's produced his ow ...
The first battle on the UFC 111 main card will feature a lightweight tussle between New Jersey-native Jim Miller (16-2, 5-1 UFC) and Canadian-born Brazilian jiu-jitsu black belt Mark Bocek (8-2, 4-2 UFC) in what could turn out to be an appealing match-up for those fans drawn to the technical aspects of mixed martial arts. Miller enters the contest riding a three-fight win streak with victories over Mac Danzig, Duane Ludwig, and Steve Lopez. Bocek has also had some success as he's produced his own three-fight winning streak with wins over Alvin Robinson, David Bielkheden, and Joe Brammer.
The appeal in this match-up revolves around the scrappy grappling skills that Mark Bocek has put on display in the Octagon in past bouts. The Nova Uniao black belt has produced six victories by way of submission in his eight wins as a professional mixed martial artist, and it's a sure bet that Bocek's skills are formidable enough to give Jim Miller a challenge on the ground.
Bocek will have to deal with a fighter who has built a reputation as being flexible, tough, and what many fans would call a "grinder" in the cage. Miller has been notable among fans and fellow fighters as having the ability to show up on a moment's notice and win, but he's also a fairly well-rounded fighter mixing brown belt level Brazilian jiu-jitsu skills, wrestling, and slightly above average striking. While he's by no means an unstoppable force, Miller will hang in a fight to the very end and still show that he's a threat to finish a fight.
Bocek's gameplan is pretty straightforward. He'll want to put Miller on the ground and positionally dominate him until he can work his way to his back and sink a choke in, or find some way to isolate a limb and submit him. In either case, he'll rely on his grappling acumen to secure a victory.
Miller has stated that his wrestling will be key in this fight, and Bocek has made some comments talking about Miller's "grinder" status and conditioning level as being an obstacle. Bocek has brought in plenty of southpaw wrestlers to mask Miller's style, and he'll be the first legitimate black belt that Miller has faced in his career. That sort of hints at the possibility of an upset here, and I wouldn't put it past Bocek to cause some problems.
I'm somewhat interested in seeing how this battle unfolds, and I'm actually glad to see a grappler like Bocek get a shot on the main card. Miller's best chance will be to use his wrestling to maintain the feet and pepper Bocek with strikes, and more often than not -- he'll succeed in that objective. Miller is the favorite, and he should be able to win this over the course of three rounds.
The bettor in me, however, is definitely looking at a play on Mark Bocek. He'll be the first black belt that Miller has fought, and while Miller is very scrappy on the ground -- he isn't immune to being trapped in bad positions. Bocek's level of grappling is very good, and he's been rolling through divisional talent as of late by using those skills. Miller will be a tough test, but Bocek has an opportunity to surprise a lot of fans on Saturday night.
-
Un espectacular final de Kobe Bryant da el triunfo a Lakers ante los Spurs en San Antonio
[Spanish News, Noticias] (Deportes. Noticias, vídeos y fotos de Deportes en lainformacion.com)Pau Gasol se impuso en su particular duelo con Tim Duncan SAN ANTONIO (ESTADOS UNIDOS), 25 (EUROPA PRESS)Un espectacular final de Kobe Bryant y la reacción de Lakers en la segunda parte resultaron vitales para que los vigentes campeones mantuvieran su racha victoriosa y encadenaran su séptima victoria consecutiva tras imponerse esta madrugada sobre los Spurs (83-92) en San Antonio. Bryant, 24 puntos con 10 de ellos en el último cuarto y seis asistencias, se erigió de nuevo en el líder de lo ...
Pau Gasol se impuso en su particular duelo con Tim Duncan
SAN ANTONIO (ESTADOS UNIDOS), 25 (EUROPA PRESS)
Un espectacular final de Kobe Bryant y la reacción de Lakers en la segunda parte resultaron vitales para que los vigentes campeones mantuvieran su racha victoriosa y encadenaran su séptima victoria consecutiva tras imponerse esta madrugada sobre los Spurs (83-92) en San Antonio.
Bryant, 24 puntos con 10 de ellos en el último cuarto y seis asistencias, se erigió de nuevo en el líder de los púrpura y oro, además, la mejora en defensa de los californianos y un Pau Gasol imponiéndose en su duelo particular sobre Tim Duncan, unido a los robos de Artest, fueron las claves del triunfo de los de Phil Jackson.
Lakers llegó a ir perdiendo de 10 puntos en la primera parte, pero supieron reaccionar a tiempo en la segunda para remontar y certificar un triunfo en el último cuarto gracias al acierto desde el triple de Kobe Bryant, que no falló y dio el triunfo a los suyos.
Enfrente unos Spurs, que siguen echando en falta al base francés Tony Parker, y donde el escolta argentino 'Manu' Ginóbili volvió a ser el mejor en los texanos con 24 puntos, cuatro rebotes y dos asistencias, mientras que George Hill contribuyó con 21. Los de San Antonio, además, acusaron la ausencia de puntos de Tim Duncan, bien 'secado' por Gasol, que le dejó en seis puntos y 12 rebotes.
Y es que el de Sant Boi, que no firmó su mejor partido, cumplió con su labor y se impuso en su mano a mano con el de Islas Vírgenes, en uno de los clásicos ya en la NBA, y ayudó a su equipo en defensa, además de firmar 10 puntos y 12 rebotes.
FICHA TÉCNICA.
--RESULTADO: SAN ANTONIO SPURS, 83 - LOS ANGELES LAKERS, 92.
--EQUIPOS.
SAN ANTONIO SPURS: Hill (21), Ginóbili (24), McDyess (2), Duncan (6), Jefferson (6) -cinco inicial-, Bonner (8), Mason (9), Bogans (-), Blair (5), Temple (2), Hairston (-) y Mahinmi (-).
LOS ANGELES LAKERS: Bryant (24), Fisher (3), Gasol (10), Odom (19), Artest (16) -cinco inicial-, Farmar (11), Brown (8), Powell (-), Mbenga (1) y Vujacic (-).
--PARCIALES: 25-22, 23-19, 18-30 y 17-21.
--ARBITROS: David Jones, Olandis Poole, Joe Derosa.
--PABELLÓN: AT&T; Center, San Antonio. 18.581 espectadores.
-
With the 21st Pick in the 2010 Stampede Blue Community Mock Draft, the Cincinnati Bengals select...
[Indianapolis Colts] (Stampede Blue)Logo by coltsfan723 Sean Weatherspoon, OLB - Missouri Pick made by FineClub: While Cincinnati was the AFC North's best team last season, in order to go further they are going to have to improve especially defensively. Enter Sean Weatherspoon. The Tangible: Weatherspoon is 6-1, 239LBS. He is a first team Big 12 player. He had 20 tackles in a game versus Buffalo. He is fast and strong. He is pro level out of the gate and should be exceptional with the right coaching. The Intangible: Weat ...
Sean Weatherspoon, OLB - Missouri
Pick made by FineClub:
While Cincinnati was the AFC North's best team last season, in order to go further they are going to have to improve especially defensively. Enter Sean Weatherspoon.The Tangible:Weatherspoon is 6-1, 239LBS. He is a first team Big 12 player. He had 20 tackles in a game versus Buffalo. He is fast and strong. He is pro level out of the gate and should be exceptional with the right coaching.The Intangible:Weatherspoon is known for a great deal of enthusiasm and is viewed as a team leader. He is also known for having a great work ethic.If Weatherspoon is taken #21 by the Bengals, it would be the 3rd LB taken in the first round by the Bengals over the past 6 years (David Pollack & Keith Rivers). He would be the first LB taken in the 1st round ever from Missouri, and the first LB drafted at all since 1984 (Bobby Bell).
Weatherspoon's Scouting Report from Mocking the Draft
The Patriots, and skywalker, are on the clock...
Pos Team Player Pos School Drafter 1 St. Louis Jimmy Clausen QB Notre Dame TouchdownColts 2 Detroit Russell Okung OT Oklahoma St. coltsfan723 3 Tampa Bay Ndamukong Suh DT Nebraska TheAngelsColts 4 Washington Sam Bradford QB Oklahoma Colts Homer 5 Kansas City Eric Berry S Tennessee sanders_fan89 6 Seattle Gerald McCoy DT Oklahoma shake n bake 7 Cleveland Earl Thomas S Texas 2ndBlueGeneration 8 Oakland Bruce Campbell OT Maryland LovinBlue 9 Buffalo Bryan Bulaga OT Iowa Cassieper 10 Jacksonville Rolando McClain LB Alabama peytonsthebest 11 Denver Derrick Morgan DE Georgia Tech JPBarnett 12 Miami Dez Bryant WR Oklahoma St. fpacheco 13 San Francisco Joe Haden CB Florida BlueVol03 14 Seattle Charles Brown OT USC shake n bake 15 N.Y. Giants C.J. Spiller RB Clemson gizzardfanny 16 Tennessee Jason Pierre-Paul DE South Florida Addai Another Day 17 San Francisco Mike Iupati G Idaho BlueVol03 18 Pittsburgh Kyle Wilson CB Boise St. LV Steelers Fan 19 Atlanta Brandon Graham DE Michigan fiftycal2004 20 Houston Dan Williams DT Tennessee Aerostar193 21 Cincinnati Sean Weatherspoon OLB Missouri FineClub 22 New England skywalker 23 Green Bay bracketismyboy 24 Philadelphia TehRhino 25 Baltimore SupermanWearsBobSander'sPJs 26 Arizona NYKings 27 Dallas jules62 28 San Diego chad72 29 N.Y. Jets diagenesis 30 Minnesota DClark#44 31 Indianapolis mgrex03 32 New Orleans palco -
Harley Davidson &Iowa Hawkeye Quilt - Baarter - The Web's largest ...
[Harley-Davidson] (HARLEY DAVIDSON - Google Blog Search)Iowa Hawkeye &Levi; Quilt With Pillow, Fits queen or full bed asking $200. Harley Davidson & Levi Quilt With Pillow, Fits queen or full bed $200. Budwesier & Levi Quilt With Pillow, Fits queen or full bed $175. Brown Leather & Levi Quilt ...
Iowa Hawkeye &Levi; Quilt With Pillow, Fits queen or full bed asking $200. Harley Davidson & Levi Quilt With Pillow, Fits queen or full bed $200. Budwesier & Levi Quilt With Pillow, Fits queen or full bed $175. Brown Leather & Levi Quilt ... -
Silverlight Cream for March 24, 2010 -- #819
[RIA (Rich Internet Apps)] (WynApse)In this Issue: Nokola, Tim Heuer, Christian Schormann, Brad Abrams, David Kelley, Phil Middlemiss, Michael Klucher, Brandon Watson, Kunal Chowdhury, Jacek Ciereszko, and Unni. Shoutouts: Michael Klucher has a short post up For Love of the Game (Development)…, where he's looking for some input from the developer community. Shawn Hargreaves has a link post up of all the ...
In this Issue: Nokola, Tim Heuer, Christian Schormann, Brad Abrams, David Kelley, Phil Middlemiss, Michael Klucher, Brandon Watson, Kunal Chowdhury, Jacek Ciereszko, and Unni.
Shoutouts:
Michael Klucher has a short post up For Love of the Game (Development)…, where he's looking for some input from the developer community.
Shawn Hargreaves has a link post up of all the Windows Phone MIX10 presentations
Chris Cavanagh has a Soft-Body Physics for Windows Phone 7 post up that goes along with one he did 1-1/2 years ago!
Jeff Weber posted An Open Letter To Microsoft Regarding The Silverlight Game Development Community
Pete Brown posted his MIX10 Recap ... lots of information, and discussion of what he was up to ... I liked the Trivia app Pete... glad to hear that was yours :)
I've changed my mind and added a WP7 tag to SilverlightCream. I'll straighten out all the Mobile plus Silverlight links to point at the WP7 tab hopefully tonight.
From SilverlightCream.com:- EasyPainter Source Pack 3: Adorners, Mouse Cursors and Frames
- Nokola has been busy with EasyPainter adding in Custom, Extensible Mouse Cursors and Customizable Adorners with extensible adorner frames, and best of all... all with source code!
- Simulate Geo Location in Silverlight Windows Phone 7 emulator
- Among the things we don't have in our WP7 emulators is Geo Location... Tim Heuer comes to the rescue with a simulator for it... too cool, Tim!
- Blend 4: About Path Layout, Part II
- Christian Schormann is back with Part 2 of his tutorial sequence on the new Path Layout. Really good info and definitely cool presentations of the control.
- Silverlight 4 + RIA Services - Ready for Business: Exposing OData Services
- Brad Abrams continues his series with a post on exposing OData services. This looks like a great tutorial on the topic... will probably resolve some questions I've been having :)
- No Silverlight and Preloader Experience(ish) - in 10 seconds...
- David Kelley exposes the code he uses on his site, designed to be friendly to Silverlight and non-Silverlight users alike.
- Merged Dictionaries of Style Resources and Blend
- Phil Middlemiss has a nice article up on Merged Dictionaries and using multiple resource dictionaries that the app chooses, but also be compatible with Prism and Blend while not eating your system resources out of house and home.
- XNA Game Studio and Windows Phone Emulator Compatibility
- Michael Klucher has a definitive post up about getting your XNA and system up-to-speed for WP7... a must-read if you've been running any of the other XNA drops.
- Windows Phone 7 301 Redirect Bug
- Brandon Watson reports a 301 Redirect bug on WP7 ... see the code and how he got it, then follow along as he explains all the debug paths he took and what the resolution (?) really is :)
- Silverlight 4: How to use the new Printing API?
- Kunal Chowdhury has a tutorial up on printing with Silverlight 4 RC... from the project layout to printing and then printing a smaller section... all good
- Printing problem in Silverlight 4.0 RC - loading images in code behind
- Jacek Ciereszko also is writing about printing, and in his case he had problems with loading an image dynamically and printing it... plus he provides a solution to the 'blank page' problem.
- ToolboxExampleAttribute - a new extension point in Blend 4 (and a few other extensibility related changes)
- Unni has an article up about Expression Blend 4's new ToolboxExampleAttribute which allow you to have multiple examples of the same type resulting in different XAML produced.
Stay in the 'Light!
Twitter SilverlightNews | Twitter WynApse | WynApse.com | Tagged Posts | SilverlightCream
Join me @ SilverlightCream | Phoenix Silverlight User Group
Technorati Tags:
Silverlight
Silverlight 3
Silverlight 4
Windows Phone
MIX10
-
Today's media stories from the papers
[Journalism, Guardian] (Media news, UK and world media comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk)If you are viewing this on the web and would prefer to get it as an email every morning, please click hereTop stories on MediaGuardian.co.ukChina's internet generation breaks the silence Google may have gone but the country's 400m internet users are finding ever more creative ways of evading censorshipTelegraph Mdia Group lifted by land sale and print deals TMG's strong 2009 performance aided by £13.2m of exceptional profits as it exited two printing venturesBen Clissitt to be Telegraph sport c ...
If you are viewing this on the web and would prefer to get it as an email every morning, please click here
Top stories on MediaGuardian.co.uk
China's internet generation breaks the silence
Google may have gone but the country's 400m internet users are finding ever more creative ways of evading censorshipTelegraph Mdia Group lifted by land sale and print deals
TMG's strong 2009 performance aided by £13.2m of exceptional profits as it exited two printing venturesBen Clissitt to be Telegraph sport chief
Former Guardian News & Media head of sport poised to take same job at TMGThis week's featured media jobs
Multi-Media Officer at Sadlers Wells
Central London/permanent/full timeChief Sub Editor at Slimming World
Derbyshire/permanent/part timeNational Sales Manager (North) at Oxford University Press
Home-based/permanent/full timeFor more jobs, career advice and workplace news visit guardianjobs.co.uk
Today's headlines
Leading scientists complain to PCC over inaccurate newspaper report of Sunday Times on global warming. P11
China's web generation pursues freedom denied by mainstream media. P24
Timothy Garton Ash on finding rules for a global village beyond China. P31
Obituary: US photojournalist Charles Moore. P36
Irish journalist David Cronin on the day he tried to arrest Tony Blair. G2 P3Avatar director James Cameron in fight with Fox News. P13
GMG chief executive Carolyn McCall to join easyJet. P24
China's reaction on Google. P28
Editorial on Google facing China. P36
Question & Debate about Google leaving China. P40
Katy Guest on Sophie Dahl's show. P41
Obituary: US TV actor Davy Crockett. P42
INM sees advertising revenues stabilise in second half. P46
GMG begins search for new chief executive. P48Telegraph wins six prizes at British Press Awards. P2
Sir Ian McKellen criticises BBC for abolishing plays in favour of reality TV. P3
Oprah Winfrey settles defamation legal battle. P18
Matt Warman on voters creating a new kind of politics on the web. P30
Life On Mars' Philip Glenister on how PC rules are ruining TV. P34
Independent sale near after parent company reported pre-tax loss of £27.7m. Business P10Oprah Winfrey settles defamation legal battle. P40
GMG chief executive Carolyn McCall to join easyJet. P47
INM says sale of Independent to Alexander Lebedev is imminent. P51Twitter and blogs put analysis in the hand of the people. P4
China Unicom to drop Google search on phones using Android. P27
YouGov embraces social websites. P28
Bejing appears uncertain how to react on Google. P32
David Pilling on Google. P35
Data traffic outstrips mobile voice calls. P41
Hopes of advertising rebound push ITV shares. P52Google co-founder Brin's China decision was moved by his Soviet memories. P3
John Bolton comments Google. P14
GMG chief executive Carolyn McCall to join easyJet. P23
INM says sale of Independent to Alexander Lebedev is imminent. P25Two British Press Awards for the Daily Mail. P2
Jamie Oliver on David Letterman show. P38News at Ten's Mark Austin has a dig at people who forget microphones are turned on in studio. P17
Interview with actor and presenter Nadia Sawalha. P40-41BBC may delay The Apprentice if there is a hung parliament. P13
Facebook claims The X Factor final day on 13 December was one of the happiest days of last year. P13
Kelvin MacKenzie attacks BBC flying Anne Robinson to Glasgow to record The Weakest Link. P15
Profile of Louie Spence of Sky1's Pineapple Dance Studios. P32-33
Coverage of BBC1's Over the Rainbow. TV Biz P1
Dancing on Ice Coverage. TV Biz P2-3
Woman billed as royal on BBC show Undercover Princesses criticised by Ugandan royal family. TV Biz P3
Alexa Chung and Henry Holland to host new series of Frock Me on Channel 4's T4. TV Biz P4Actor Norris Cole 'fell asleep' during filming of Blanche's funeral in Coronation Street. P3
Dancing on Ice coverage. P3
Chris Evans pulling in 8% more listeners on Radio 2 than Terry Wogan. P11
Sophie Dahl's BBC2 cooking show loses out to Channel 4's Supersize v Superskinny. P35Woman billed as royal on BBC show Undercover Princesses criticised by Ugandan royal family. P17
Dancing on Ice coverage. P39
Gavin and Stacey's Joanna Page to host Sky1's My Pet Shame
Katy Brand to get ITV2 series. P39And finally ...
Countdown co-presenter Rachel Riley was left cringing on Tuesday's show after the F-word popped up on the letters board, report the Sun and Star. Host Jeff Stelling gave a wry smile when he noticed that the letters U, D, F, C, K, and E spelled out a six-letter version of the swearword. The contestants saved the show from viewer complaints by opting for the five-letter words 'Faced' and 'Caged' instead. Meanwhile, the dictionary team picked the six-letter 'Dockage' and the seven-letter 'Dogface'. The Sun P37, Daily Star P24
Also on MediaGuardian.co.uk today
Budget confirms broadband tax
Chancellor reaffirms 50p a month levy on landlines to support superfast broadband, and offers tax relief to video games industryInstapaper's plans for Apple's iPad
Developer Marco Arment has revealed details of the Instapaper iPad appIndependent deal due 'within 24 hours'
Independent News & Media promises analysts 'very positive news flow' over prospect of papers' sale to Alexander LebedevGowalla battles Foursquare
Applications are competing to be the location tool of choice on iPhone and elsewhereGMG's Carolyn McCall confirmed as easyJet chief
Executive to leave Guardian group after 24 years to lead airlineASA criticises Lenny Henry ad
The Premier Inn advert parodying The Shining was mistakenly broadcast during children's television programmesM&S; launches Dannii Minogue ads
Multimillion-pound campaign for womenswear and lingerie also features singer VV Brown and model Ana Beatriz BarrosFreesat claims millionth customer
The digital satellite service says 400,000 customers have defected from BSkyBRicky Gervais show gets second HBO series
The animated television series has been recommissioned by HBO, with the first series starting in the UK in AprilMedia Talk podcast
BBC internet chief Erik Huggers describes the corporation's slimmed-down website. Plus, Michael Wolff on Rupert Murdoch's paywall plans
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
2010 NFL Draft Follows Madden Format: New Mock Draft with New Order
[New England Patriots, Sports, Fantasy Football] (Bleacher Report - Front Page)Before I start to explain the exact rule change that Roger Goodell decided to make, I would like to announce that for my NFL Mock Draft series, I will only be doing the top half of the first round. With the Draft getting closer and closer, I am also nearing the end of my first semester in college and projects, tests and finals are starting to pile up, it's a lot of work and my writing may become scarce until May 6th. As for the groundbreaking new rule that Roger Goodell has made, he will b ...
Before I start to explain the exact rule change that Roger Goodell decided to make, I would like to announce that for my NFL Mock Draft series, I will only be doing the top half of the first round.
With the Draft getting closer and closer, I am also nearing the end of my first semester in college and projects, tests and finals are starting to pile up, it's a lot of work and my writing may become scarce until May 6th.
As for the groundbreaking new rule that Roger Goodell has made, he will be adopting a new format in the NFL Draft. Rather than let the teams go by which had the worst record, they will be doing a completely random format.
Also, as a way to level the playing field with the new draft format, they will give every team one pick in each round, completely eliminating any trade that had traded for extra pick, and pissing off a lot of teams (such as Seattle, Denver, New England, etc.) and making others really happy (Chicago Bears).
This format will be the exact same as the format used in fantasy drafts that you can choose to do in the Madden NFL game's franchise mode.
Luckily for all of you, I have inside sources with the higher-ups in the NFL offices, and they tell me that they have already selected which team will pick where, and it may not have been as random as they say.
They have given me a draft order by team, leaving me the only person who can give a real mock draft (I feel like this isn't the first time this happened).
Without further ado, here is the first mock draft that has the new order. Let the horrible, horrible jokes begin.
1. New Orleans Saints- Trindon Holliday
The Saints have been on holiday ever since they won the Super Bowl, and they want to continue that success through the regular season. They get this pick because they are a feel good team and the NFL doesn't want the story to fall.
2. Chicago Bears- Arrelious Benn
The Bears want a home team talent, and even though Benn shouldn't be in the top two, they want a receiver because they don't exactly know how to fix their problems in the first round.
3. New England Patriots- Tim Tebow
The Pats just haven't been the same since they went 16-0. They have lost that intensity, and that is just what Tim Tebow brings to the table. In an effort to bend the rules, Bill Belicheck decides to try to trade Tom Brady and get another first round pick, which is illegal under the new system. They lose this pick and Tim Tebow is banished from the NFL to keep things fair.
4. Indianapolis Colts- Mike Iupati
The Colts make a pick of a guy who seemingly will do a good job, but the odd part about this pick is that they didn't do any scouting. The Colts are a very finnesse team and they want to get more physical. To do that, they took the biggest offensive lineman in the draft, and at 331 lbs, that's Iupati.
5. Oakland Raiders- Jacoby Ford
Remember last season when the Raiders took Darrius Heyward-Bey before Michael Crabtree because he had the quickest 40-yard dash, well they are going to do the same thing this season, because Ford ran the quickest 40-yard dash with a 4.28 time.
*To speed things up, the rest of the teams will have only a short description.
6. Minnesota Vikings- Chris Carter- Chris Carter was a great wide receiver for the Vikings, but this wide receiver is one of just two players in the draft from the Great West Conference.
7. Dallas Cowboys- Tim Tebow- Jerry Jones tries to get Tebow reinstated, doesn't work, the pick is a waste.
8. Atlanta Falcons- Crezdon Butler- Dunta and Crezdon will the ball hawks for the Falcons. No team will ever use first names for their secondary...ever.
9. Houston Texans- Colt McCoy- After not taking the home town talent far too early a few seasons ago, they take the home town talent far too early this year.
10. Cincinnati Bengals- Nyan Boateng- The Bengals disappointed when they didn't sign Terrell Owens, but they were just planning on taking this troubled wide receiver for much cheaper.
11. Washington Redskins- Riley Skinner- The Redskins really don't want Jason Campbell to start, but this quarterback will result in Mike Shannahan yelling "SKKKINNNEEERRR." (Simpsons anybody?)
12. Miami Dolphins- Jarrett Brown- The Dolphins liked their pick of Pat White so much, they draft another fast West Virginia QB.
13. San Fransisco 49ers- Kyle Jolly- After Michael Crabtree was such a "crab" last season, they hope Jolly will sign right away. Plus, at 311 lbs, he will make a great Santa at the Christmas party. (Too many jokes about his last name?)
14. Arizona Cardinals- Sam Bradford- Last time I did this, I gave the Cardinals a guy who was expected to be a top five pick, I'm doing the same this time and I'm not even a Cardinals fan.
15. Seattle Seahawks- Taylor Mays- He reunites with Pete Carroll, absolutely no other reason for this pick.
16. Tampa Bay Buccaneers- Akwasi Owusu-Ansah- The Bucs want Aqib Talib and Owusu-Ansah to have a crazier name-combo of corners than the Falcons.
17. St. Louis Rams- Barry Church- The Rams are looking to religion to get better this season, after a horrible 1-15 season last year.
18. Green Bay Packers- Nolan Carroll- Because I don't like the Packers, I went to corner, closed my eyes, and clicked on a player. After landing on Owusu-Ansah once, I landed on Carroll.
19. Cleveland Browns- Levi Brown- The Browns need a QB and Brown's last name is the same name as the team. Match made in heaven? I think so.
20. New York Jets- Michael Hoomanawanui- [insert childish joke about last name here]
21. Tennessee Titans- Toby Gerhart- They will have the top rushers from last season in the NFL and NCAA.
22. Carolina Panthers- Geno Atkins- Pepper is unhealthy, so they go on the Atkins diet.
23. Buffalo Bills- Dan LeFevour- LeFevour is used to playing in a cold stadium for a team that doesn't matter.
24. Denver Broncos- Greg Hardy- Josh McDaniels is the youngest coach in the NFL, but makes a big mistake, thinking that this Hardy is related to Ed Hardy in hopes of getting discounted clothing.
25. Pittsburgh Steelers- Dakota Watson- After seeing the Red Bull commercials, Mike Tomlin wants to be able to say "My dear Watson." The joke will get un-funny on day two of training camp. Dakota Fanning jokes will be made for a small time as well.
26. New York Giants- Pat Angerer- New York is generally an angry place. (pushing it?)
27. Philadelphia Eagles- Jahvid Best- This is part of their plan to get DJ Khaled to do a song about them, however, their plan causes them to lose fans, as DJ Khaled is awful.
28. San Diego Chargers- Joe McNight- Taking LaDainian Tomlinson's spot is a job only fit for a knight, a McNight.
29. Detroit Lions- Scott Long- The Lions love WR's, which will be especially true now that that they have a QB. They take Long because his last name describes their chances.
30. Jacksonville Jaguars- C.J Spiller- They aren't that far removed from having one of the best 1-2 runningback duos in the NFL, they want to get back to that level.
31. Baltimore Ravens- David Reed- They hope he can recreate the magic that the other Reed on their team has, only this time on offense.
32. Kansas City Chiefs- Ndamukong Suh- I felt bad for putting them last.
Thanks to everybody who made through all the bad jokes, you are rewarded with $455 theoretical dollars. Leave your e-mail for your theoretical prize.
I'm Joe W.
-
On Health Care Reform, Sex Offenders and Viagra
[Law] (Wise Law Blog)The antics never end in Washington, D.C. Republicans were mighty busy Wednesday night, tabling proposed amendments to the health care reconciliation bill that is currently been debated in the Senate. The Democrats have made it known that all amendments will be defeated, as any change to the bill will derail their delicate health care reform agreement with the House. Since they can't win on health care, the Republicans are taking the opportunity to get some interesting campaign-oriented sound-bi ...
The antics never end in Washington, D.C.
Republicans were mighty busy Wednesday night, tabling proposed amendments to the health care reconciliation bill that is currently been debated in the Senate. The Democrats have made it known that all amendments will be defeated, as any change to the bill will derail their delicate health care reform agreement with the House.
Since they can't win on health care, the Republicans are taking the opportunity to get some interesting campaign-oriented sound-bites out of the process.
Digby explains:Yes, they're just trying to improve the bill. You've undoubtedly heard about the important improvement to keep Viagra from sex offenders. Here are just a few more:
Brownback 3653 –“To promote the production of renewable fuel.”Brownback 3690 -- “To provide for the relocation of the United State Embassy to Jerusalem.”
Vitter 4872 – “To repeal the law that provides automatic pay increases for members of Congress.”
Republicans have something of a free shot in the reconciliation bill. Democrats have already signaled that they will whip against any amendments and changes to the bill, in an effort to pass it intact and send it directly to the President, avoiding another vote in the House. So Republicans can write virtually any amendment, forcing Democrats into terrible votes, without much consequence, knowing they will be defeated and providing campaign ad fodder
As the Senate gets closer to voting on a health care reconciliation bill, the Republican strategy to derail the Democrats' plans is getting creative--and dirty. Their strategy is clear: with Democrats determined to pass a clean bill, Republicans will force them to vote down politically juiced-up amendments, and likely turn them into political ads meant to characterize Dems as sympathetic to sex offenders and fraudsters.
The goal is simple. To expedite its passage, Democrats need to keep the changes to the reconciliation bill to a minimum, and so have committed to voting down all amendments, even ones that they like. And Republicans want to turn those votes into negative campaign ads ahead of this November's election.
Once the votes are cast, the ads all but write themselves.
"Senator X voted to preserve sex offenders' right to Viagra."
And so on.
Let the games begin.
- Garry J. Wise, Toronto
UPDATE: New York Times reports that due to parliamentary concerns regarding peripheral issues in the bill, the reconciliation bill will have to go back to the House for yet another vote, after all.
“The parliamentarian struck two minor provisions tonight from the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act,” the spokeswoman, Kate Cyrul, said. “These changes do not impact the reforms to the student loan programs and the important investments in education. We are confident the House will quickly pass the bill with these minor changes.”
- GJW
Visit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net
EMPLOYMENT LAW • CIVIL LITIGATION • WILLS AND ESTATES • FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE
ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG
-
Jackson Browne & David Lindley Playing Cleveland Sept 19th
[Cleveland, Cleveland, OH] (Cleveland Leader - Cleveland News & More!)Jackson Browne & David Lindley have announced a lengthy tour that includes a stop in Cleveland. This is the first time since 2006 that the pair, who have worked together nearly 4 decades, are hitting the road together. Accompanying Jackson Browne and David Lindley on tour will be Browne's band of almost 20 years: Kevin McCormick (bass), Mark Goldenberg (guitars), Mauricio Lewak (drums) and Jeff Young (keyboards, backing vocals). They're joined by members (since 2008) Chavonne Stewart and Ale ...
Jackson Browne & David Lindley have announced a lengthy tour that includes a stop in Cleveland. This is the first time since 2006 that the pair, who have worked together nearly 4 decades, are hitting the road together. Accompanying Jackson Browne and David Lindley on tour will be Browne's band of almost 20 years: Kevin McCormick (bass), Mark Goldenberg (guitars), Mauricio Lewak (drums) and Jeff Young (keyboards, backing vocals). They're joined by members (since 2008) Chavonne Stewart and Alethea Mills, vocalists Browne (as a mentor) met in 2001 when they were attending Washington Preparatory High School in South Los Angeles, singing in the school choir.
Here are the complete tour dates:
-
New member, looking for help setting up!!
[Aquarium] (Aquarium Forum)Hello I am new to this site and see a lot of useful information. I have had my tank set up in the past, and then packed it up and let it sit for the last three years. So I am not really new to having an aquarium. I am setting it back up again and seem to have a problem I have a 50 gallon freshwater tank, fluval 305 filter, heater, and undergravel filter. I set the tank up added Start Right. Let it sit for a 3 days, everything looked good so I added a couple ( 3 small) tiger barbs to get t ...
Hello I am new to this site and see a lot of useful information. I have had my tank set up in the past, and then packed it up and let it sit for the last three years. So I am not really new to having an aquarium. I am setting it back up again and seem to have a problem I have a 50 gallon freshwater tank, fluval 305 filter, heater, and undergravel filter. I set the tank up added Start Right. Let it sit for a 3 days, everything looked good so I added a couple ( 3 small) tiger barbs to get the tank to cycle. Looking good. I added a couple large pieces of shale to the tank, the next day my water was really cloudy and the stink was terriable. I removed the shale ( I think that was the problem) when I pulled it out it was slimey and almost like made of clay (explains the muddy looking tank and smell). I changed about 75% of my water, cleaned my filter, looked OK, the next morning very cloudy and stinks really bad. So I then changed 75% of my water removed the plastic weeds and the rest of the other rocks (which I used in the past with no problems I think they are granite and slate) I also cleaned my filter again the pads were very brown and have a very bad smell. Today I again did a very large water change, cleaned my filter, and removed and washed about half of my gravel, refilled my tank and it seems to already have a bad odor after only a couple of hours. This tank has only been set up for less than 2 weeks, I cant seem to get the bad smell to stay away. My poor starter fish are still hanging in there, and I am sure my filter is working. Sorry about the long post, but I wanted to give all the information for some intellegent help!! Thanks David*H2 -
new to site looking for help, stinky water!
[Aquarium] (Aquarium Forum)Hello I am new to this site and see a lot of useful information. I have had my tank set up in the past, and then packed it up and let it sit for the last three years. So I am not really new to having an aquarium. I am setting it back up again and seem to have a problem I have a 50 gallon freshwater tank, fluval 305 filter, heater, and undergravel filter. I set the tank up added Start Right. Let it sit for a 3 days, everything looked good so I added a couple ( 3 small) tiger barbs to get the tan ...
Hello I am new to this site and see a lot of useful information. I have had my tank set up in the past, and then packed it up and let it sit for the last three years. So I am not really new to having an aquarium. I am setting it back up again and seem to have a problem I have a 50 gallon freshwater tank, fluval 305 filter, heater, and undergravel filter. I set the tank up added Start Right. Let it sit for a 3 days, everything looked good so I added a couple ( 3 small) tiger barbs to get the tank to cycle. Looking good. I added a couple large pieces of shale to the tank, the next day my water was really cloudy and the stink was terriable. I removed the shale ( I think that was the problem) when I pulled it out it was slimey and almost like made of clay (explains the muddy looking tank and smell). I changed about 75% of my water, cleaned my filter, looked OK, the next morning very cloudy and stinks really bad. So I then changed 75% of my water removed the plastic weeds and the rest of the other rocks (which I used in the past with no problems I think they are granite and slate) I also cleaned my filter again the pads were very brown and have a very bad smell. Today I again did a very large water change, cleaned my filter, and removed and washed about half of my gravel, refilled my tank and it seems to already have a bad odor after only a couple of hours. This tank has only been set up for less than 2 weeks, I cant seem to get the bad smell to stay away. My poor starter fish are still hanging in there, and I am sure my filter is working. Sorry about the long post, but I wanted to give all the information for some intellegent help!! Thanks David -
Bitter News, 3-24-10
[Law] (RSS Feed for Columns | BITTER LAWYER)Headlines from the Bitter Newsroom as flirty as Hillary Clinton with the Pakistani Foreign Minister: Law schools, law schools, law schools. We’ve had enough of beating that dead horse. So let’s admire business schools, shall we? Here’s a new list of the world’s best. Don’t listen to all the other loser rankings. This one is the best. Like Harvard. (Woops. Spoiled it there, didn’t I?) [Business Insider] Okay, you know we really couldn’t leave the law school dea ...

Headlines from the Bitter Newsroom as flirty as Hillary Clinton with the Pakistani Foreign Minister: Law schools, law schools, law schools. We’ve had enough of beating that dead horse. So let’s admire business schools, shall we? Here’s a new list of the world’s best. Don’t listen to all the other loser rankings. This one is the best. Like Harvard. (Woops. Spoiled it there, didn’t I?) [Business Insider] Okay, you know we really couldn’t leave the law school dead horse alone. A new study finds that graduates from top-10 law schools were MORE likely to get laid off than grads from lower-ranked schools. Get your “sense of entitlement” outta here, Yalies. TTTs wanna work! …Sez the study. [BLT: The Blog of the Legal Times] Manhattan lawyer Louis “Big Lou” Posner pleaded guilty to running a prostitution ring “out of a Midtown jiggle joint.” A service that even he himself admittedly enjoyed. He was barred from working in, going to or being associated with any strip club or lap dance performance for five years. Punishment enough. [New York Daily News] President Obama keeps heralding that new health care will make small businesses winners. But Keith Ashmus, a partner at Cleveland law firm Frantz Ward LLP, thinks that those with more than 50 employees—like his firm—aren’t going to be sitting pretty. Meanwhile, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli isn’t happy either. He filed a lawsuit. Not because of the Supremacy Clause, stupid. Because he says the health-care law is plain ol’ unconstitutional. Duh. [WSJ Law Blog] What do we want? BL1Y on The Apprentice. When do we want it? Next season. Go! [Above the Law] Men. Men B harassin. Even B harassin other men. No, not sexually necessarily. But that doesn’t matter. Since the start of the recession, sexual harassment claims from men have been surging. Some guys call it horsing around or blowing off steam. Others call it a compulsory lashing out as a result of deep-seeded, insurmountable self-hate. [Wall Street Journal via ABA Journal] Who the hell needs Peeps to have fun with the law? Tweet “something pithy” about your favorite SCOTUS case in 131 characters or less with the hashtag #cbftech so Dan Schwartz can illustrate “how technology is changing the practice of law” at a UConn Law School program. Hmm, it sort of reminds us of another law school attempt to illustrate a point. Let’s home this one doesn’t convey as well. [Connecticut Law Blog via Robert Ambrogi’s LawSites] Law school deans are getting involved in trying to get “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repealed. Mainly because they argue the policy restricts diversity efforts and career options for public servants. Fair enough. Maybe while they’re at it they should also ask BigLaw partners what the hell’s going on with their “values of tolerance and respect.” They don’t even have a legal ban, and they’re still missing the mark. [The National Law Journal] Remember the days when Congress had nothing better to do than have baseball players testify about using steroids? Not over yet, folks. Jose Canseco, “the most prominent professional baseball player who stepped forward to defend [Roger] Clemens before a Congressional committee two years ago, filing an affidavit that said he had no knowledge of Clemens’s alleged use of performance-enhancing drugs,” has been subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury that’s investigating whether Clemens perjured himself. [The New York Times] A Mississippi school canceled prom after lesbian student Constance McMillen asked to bring a girl and wear a tux. That night, the school officials then probably turned on American Idol and laughed at that delightful judge Ellen. Then a federal judge ruled that the high school violated McMillen’s constitutional rights. Then worlds collided. [Guardian] Gay marriage brings men together. “Legal powerhouses” Ted Olson and David Boies talk about how they teamed up to fight against Proposition 8 and how they’re likely taking their fight all the way to the Supreme Court. [Campbell Brown Blog CNN] Still due: McGuireWoods’ $12 million in legal fees for fighting to get 300,000 BARBRI class members $125. Tick tock. [The Am Law Daily] Check out more news from previous days. Join Bitter Lawyer on Facebook. Follow on Twitter. Buy Bitter Lawyer merchandise. -
2010 AFL Round 1 Tips
[Aussie Rules] (Kick2Kick.net)The grass is cut, the white paint has dried, Round 1 of the 2010 AFL Season begins tonight ...
Richmond v Carlton
First game of the season and a fresh start for both the Tigers and the Blues in 2010. Without the fanfare of last year’s ( Cousin’s Return ) round 1 clash, Richmond seemed to be more realistic with the task at hand.
I just hope for the first proper game of the year doesn’t go down like a lead balloon - much like the ‘new’ football entertainment show on a certain channel.
It is definitely going to be a tough year down at Tigerland but I’m glad they have instilled Damien Hardwick as their coach.
A known hardman as a player and doing his apprenticeship under some decent coaches, Hardwick has all the ingredients to make it as a good coach.
Re-building at a football club hungry for success is a baptism of fire, but I like Hardwick’s realistic, competitive approach to the season.
Meanwhile down at Carlton, the Blues have been trying to wash out the stain that is Brendan Fevola .
Carlton finally decided after years of accepting the the unacceptable, that the Coleman winning goal machine just wasn’t worth it.
But now without a known goal kicker it places question marks over their forward potency. Looking at the NAB results of both teams is like trying to predict Lotto numbers – just not worth the effort.
Richmond have named Ben Cousins to play after suffering from a ‘mysterious’ stomach problem alongside the fresh blood of Dustin Martin, Ben Nason and Relton Roberts.
Mitch Farmer is an exciting player and will also line up for his first game with the Tigers after playing 3 at Port.
The Navy Blues will be missing Chris Judd for 3 weeks for suspension due to impersonating a WWE wrestler but Robbie Warnock will finally get some decent game-time for Carlton in the Ruck.
Just like last year though this time without all the hype it will be a similar result.
Carlton by 36 points
Bulldogs vs Collingwood should be the round 1 match we have been waiting for...
Geelong v Essendon
Geelong have been in cruise control over the past few months with practice games and NAB matches being treated not much more than an opportunity to stretch the legs.
You can just see ‘Bomber’ Thompson knows this is going to be a long season with two strong contenders staring menacingly at the 2010 premiership cup.
This season could come down to a battle of attrition, with the best team managing to have their best team on the park peaking at the right time.
Late last year, a lot of people were worried about whether the Cats have their best team for the Grand Final with a few injury worries.
But the only problem Mark Thompson had was choosing which player was going to miss out on a medallion. For round 1 the Cats go into the clash with their strongest lineup possible.
Tom Harley has retired, Matthew Stokes (suspended indefinitely due to White Line Fever of a different kind), Travis Varcoe (thumb) and Max Rooke (knee tendinitis) are the only players missing from last year’s best line up.
Essendon meanwhile have a few players missing due to suspension ( Nathan Lovett-Murray , Mark McVeigh , Michael Hurley ).
Both Leroy Jetta and Tyson Slattery will also be missing due to injury.
Matthew Knights has a young team full of untested potential and this will definitely find out how well the Bombers have recruited over recent years.
If Scott Gumbleton can stay fit, he just might be able to show us why Essendon have patiently waited for his injuries to come right.
The Bombers picked up Mark Williams from the Hawks during the offseason and will be hoping at the age of 26, he has matured enough to handle a consistent season of AFL.
Once the rustiness of round one has worn off, the class of the Cats will be too strong for the Matthew Knights’ young Bombers.
Geelong by 42 points
Melbourne v Hawthorn
Both teams pre-seasons have been less than ideal with mounting injury lists and very ordinary performances in both practice and NAB games.
While The Hawks are aiming to make finals this year after reaching the pinnacle in 08, Melbourne you get the feeling just want to be a lot more competitive than last year.
Hawthorn seem to missing a whole Ruckman division with Max Bailey and Simon Taylor out long-term and mature-age rookie Wayde Skipper out for a few weeks with hamstring troubles.
Big name recruit Shaun Burgoyne and the dynamic Cyril Rioli are in doubt for the match. While it remains unclear how long Brad Sewell will take to come back from a broken collarbone.
Buddy Franklin maybe looking fitter after a slimming pre season, but will miss the game due to suspension.
Melbourne have a number injuries to key player Jurrah, Morton, Bell, Watts,Johnson and Sylvia. Getting through this match with no further injuries would almost be seen as a win in Dean Bailey’s eyes.
Hawthorn still have a decent midfield with Sam Mitchell, Luke Hodge and Jordan Lewis known ball magnets and looking fit and firing for this round 1 game. Lets face it a wet sock would be more competitive than the Demons at the moment.
Hawthorn by 54 points
Sydney Swans v St Kilda
The Swans play a tight game of football that may not be visually edge of your seat kind of stuff, but gets them within a cat’s whisker of winning against much more talented teams like the Saints.
A 1 point loss to St Kilda in a pre season game might not be saying much but the Saints were genuinely having a crack at the NAB cup and the Swans were playing solidly in other games too. New recruit Mark Seaby will help the Swans big man stocks, but Daniel Bradshaw has not featured much for Sydney after undergoing minor knee surgery.
The big towering, Jesse White might have to take the next step up and show us the form that he gave glimpses of last year to lead the Swannie’s forwards. The Irish leprechaun Tadgh Kennelly is back looking, refreshed from a self imposed hiatus and might be just the experience Paul Roos needs in a developing Sydney outfit.
The Saints have had a encouraging start to the year with wins in every pre season game except the NAB Grand final against a hungrier pack of Bulldogs. Recruiting Andrew Lovett has been a disaster and Brett Peake has been less than convincing. Key players Sam Fisher and Lenny Hayes are suffering injuries, but on the other hand Nick Riewoldt and Brendon Goddard look raring to go with a solid pre season fitness campaign.
Both teams stick to a structured game-plan and this similarity is no surprise with Ross Lyon being Paul Roos’ apprentice for many years.
The game is at ANZ stadium which might suit the Saints better than a match at the SCG.
St Kilda by 24 points
Brisbane Lions v West Coast
The storm of controversy that followed Fevola to Brisvegas mimicked the weather the Lions had in a few of their rain soaked pre season matches. It has been less than ideal for Michael Voss and Brendan Fevola’s infield form has set the world alight either.
Jamie Charman is out for at least 6 weeks but the Lions should be able to cope with Mitch Clark finding a new lease on life as Brisbane’s No.1 ruck choice. New recruits Brent Staker, Aamon Buchanan, Andrew Raines and Matt Maguire have all looked great. Maguire especially if he can stay injury free could be the recruit of the year.
The Eagles are still believing the hype of the ‘new breed’ but realistically unless this ‘new breed’ has been genetically engineered we could see inconsistent performances from Woosha’s young group of players.
Their pre-season game against bogey side Port Adelaide might of given a glimpse of this.
West Coast definitely need a season where both Dean Cox and Daniel Kerr stay fit in order to support and lead the young talented players like Nic Naitanui, Chris Masten and Scott Selwood.
The formidable combination of Brown and Fevola coupled with Rich, Black and a maybe fit Power will give Brisbane the edge up at the GABBA.
Brisbane by 20 points
Port Adelaide v North Melbourne
Port Adelaide have been scarily consistently good in all their pre season games. The Power and the word ‘consistent’ go together like chalk and cheese but the signs are there that their season might not be as bad a people are predicting.
There has been good form from Travis Boak and Justin Westhoff and these are just the type of players Mark Williams needs to make that next step up. Williams has recruited Dean Laidley to help stem the flow of Port’s leaky defense and sometimes it takes two mad geniuses to invent something new.
Injuries to important players David Rodan and Daniel Motlop won’t help Port Adelaide’s cause.
North Melbourne’s form leading into round one hasn’t been great but a new coach and new facilities just might spark the Kangaroos into some sort of action this year.
North Melbourne seem to have fallen into the trap of recruiting the same type of players that have good pace and run but have been too inconsistent and too small to play key match-winning roles.
Drew Petrie if injury free seems to be their only focus up forward, and if running midfielders like Daniel Wells,Leigh Harding and Brent Harvey can’t kick bags of goals, quite simply the Roos will be caught in the headlights.
Port Adelaide by 18 points
Western Bulldogs v Collingwood
The match of the round should be a closer encounter than last time they met when the Pies went down by 24 points. The Western Bulldogs seem to be the genuine article this year and if they stay injury free will be disappointed with no less than a top 2 finish.
Denial is not a river in Egypt but what a lot of Bulldogs fans suffered from, when looking at their forward line solution to complement their excellent midfield. Barry Hall could be that cherry on top of the Bulldog’s cake, if his old body holds up and he keeps attending those anger management therapy sessions.
He may never be godfather to Brian Lake’s children but as long as Hall keeps kicking bags of goals for the Dogs, I’m sure they’ll get along just fine. A super midfield of Ryan Griffen, Adam Cooney, Matthew Boyd, Daniel Cross and Shaun Higgins should have ‘Rocket’ Rodney Eade sleeping easy most nights of the week.
Collingwood definitely have a top 5 side with a lineup now complemented by ‘new’ recruits Luke Ball and Darren Jolly. Jolly might solve the Magpies Ruckman problems but there are still question marks over forward firepower and a defensively weak midfield that might not keep up with the Bulldog’s guns.
Western Bulldogs by 16 points
Fremantle v Adelaide
Fremantle after years of making excuses for poor performances really need to bring something fresh to the table.
Recruiting a ready made AFL player in Anthony Morabito and solid performances from other newbies – Michael Barlow, Alex Silvagni and Jay van Berlo. Dockers players seem to hang around like cobwebs and some serious cleaning out of players like Des Headland and Dean Solomon (recently retired) would help.
The more experienced players like Mundy, Schammer, Crowley and Bradley need to shape up or ship out and ‘re-recruit’ (another Docker bad habit) Adam McPhee hasn’t looked worth the effort.
Meanwhile the Crows have been battling a poor pre season riddled with injuries and average form. The Crows will be missing players like Jason Porplyzia,Nathan van Berlo, Chris Knights and Brett Burton with injury concerns and there is a steady longterm injury list growing as well.
A lack of game time due to injuries from players like Andrew McLeod, Bernie Vince, and Ivan Maric would also have Neil Craig sweating if weren’t for the fact they are playing the Dockers.
Coach Craig still has a decent lineup with Kurt Tippett and Richard Douglas leading up forward and a settled backline.
Adelaide by 12 points
Your Round One Tips & Observations
So what are your tips & observations for the first round of the 2010 AFL season? Do you agree with Johnnytruent? if yes or no please post your tips and observations about the NAB competition in the comments section.
We will keep a running tally of the tips throughout the year, so make sure you get your tips in on time & you never know there could be a prize for the winner…
Share with Someone:

Related K2K Posts
- AFL Betting Round 1, 2010 (3)
- 2010 NAB Grand Final Tips (3)
- 2010 NAB Round 3 Tips (6)
- 2010 NAB Round 1 pt2 Wrapup (5)
- 2010 NAB Round 1 tips pt2 (13)
-
Lawyers of Uncertainty
[Austria] (Gates of Vienna)Someone sent us this blog post written by a man in Israel. Since his point of view regarding Britain’s latest move against Israel is similar to mine, I’m reposting what he has to say. We haven’t publicly talked about the death of Hamas terrorist Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. There has been much discussion about it in the media, but so far more heat than light has been generated and crucial questions have yet to be answered. Such a strange situation, and so many odd occurrences. I look forward to ...
Someone sent us this blog post written by a man in Israel. Since his point of view regarding Britain’s latest move against Israel is similar to mine, I’m reposting what he has to say.
We haven’t publicly talked about the death of Hamas terrorist Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. There has been much discussion about it in the media, but so far more heat than light has been generated and crucial questions have yet to be answered. Such a strange situation, and so many odd occurrences.
I look forward to the book someone is no doubt writing about it. Nonetheless, this is a story certain to bring paranoia bounding out into the daylight, gnashing its teeth and looking for something to gnaw.
The blogger, Barry Shaw, whose post I am using to build my own comments ‘round, lives in Israel. He calls his blog simply The View from Israel. Israeli Advocacy in a Difficult World. In his profile Mr. Shaw explains his reason for blogging:
Usually public opinion is formed from newspapers or TV reporting. My opinion was formed from living in Israel, witnessing the horror of terror, reading the misinformation and downright lies perpetrated by the Western media, seen the incompetence of Israeli leaders to project the facts. This blog comes from a particularly personal perspective. The articles may be controversial and provocative. I hope so. They are intended to make you think. They are intended to revise your opinion of the driving forces not only in the Middle East but also where you live. For whatever strikes Israel today will surely visit you tomorrow…
This story is a particularly explosive topic. Anything about Israel or coming out of that country turns contentious very quickly. No doubt people have strong feelings one way or another about this incident. However, I would remind commenters that just because the subject is Israel doesn’t mean the usual rules don’t apply - i.e., courtesy, civility, and reasonable discourse. The comment thread is to be limited to the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh and its aftermath, including this latest move by Britain.
Theories are fine, as long as they are civil, reasonable, adult conclusions, not global accusations we've all heard before. None of us knows enough about this situation to be able to declare with finality what “really” happened or why. However, that doesn’t keep us from making a best guess and you’re welcome to give us your opinion. Reasonably. Politely… You know the drill by now.
Wednesday, 24 March 2010
Britain Shoots Itself in The Foot
The recent public revelation from Britain’s Foreign Secretary, David Milliband, that the British Government has expelled a leading Israeli diplomat over the copying of British passports is worrying on a number of levels.
Normally, I’d correct an obvious typo in an essay, but this one is too delicious to fix. The image of lawyers stacked up like cordwood, ready to make money off the situation is beyond Freudian. But he’s right…there are indeed layers of uncertainty here. But also to be sure, the lawyers are slavering off stage.
It has not been proven that Israel is responsible for the execution of a Hamas terrorist in Dubai. There are lawyers [sic] of uncertainty over the death of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh.
The most compelling fact was that the door to his hotel room was locked and bolted from the inside. Hardly a scenario of a planned hit job by any intelligence agency.
The hotel door is a real puzzle.
No proof, video or forensic, points to any individual or organisation responsible for removing a Hamas killer from the international covert world of terror and espionage.
- - - - - - - - -
If I remember correctly, it took a while for that piece of information to be revealed. And I agree with him that the videos are not proof. The videos supplied so far have a Keystone Kops amateur hour quality to them. A normal paranoid (say, me) wonders if the Israelis have a macabre sense of humor, what with the wigs and glasses and caps and quick changes in the bathrooms, or if they - or some other ‘entity’ - deliberately made this into an overkill situation. So to speak. At any rate, the videos are bizarre…when they’re not aimless. Definitely, layer upon lawyer of uncertainty.
There was supposed to be close coordination between Israel and Britain in security and intelligence information sharing. Britain has been the beneficiary of vital classified information provided by Israel that has led to the prevention of a number of terror attacks in Britain.
We know how grateful and gracious Britain is to Israel. About the same level of courtesy that our American president shows to Britain. But it makes you wonder: why did they take so long to expel someone? And is there anything Israel could’ve done to prevent this action by Britain? I don’t think so.
Now, in a rare public display, Britain has expelled Israel’s leading intelligence official in the U.K. from the Israeli Embassy at the Court of St. James.
It’s not only rare, it’s quite tardy. What is the reason for this timing? You know it’s not arbitrary. You know they weren’t asleep and suddenly awakened to say, “Harrumph. Bad play. Out you go.” Lots of whys and whats remain to be answered here, including timing.
This act of ‘political correctness’ is foolhardy and dangerous, not for Israel but for Britain. Anyone with any knowledge of the workings at the Israeli Embassy know that it is short-staffed and under-resourced. His removal will reduce the effectiveness of Israel’s cooperation with the British authorities over terror threats that include information sharing.
I wonder if this is at all connected to the White House’s display of rudeness toward Netanyahu during his visit here? No photo ops, no diplomatic protocol. The American Congress greeted Netanyahu warmly and reiterated their support for Israel. That support is not shared by this administration as has been amply demonstrated by Obama, SecState Clinton, and Joe Biden.
At any rate, I wonder if Britain’s timing is connected to Netanyahu’s American visit?
[…]
Britain has been protected by the intelligence provided by Israel. Now, due to political considerations and their recent decision, Britain has slapped Israel in the face. More importantly, it has deprived itself of a significant link in the intelligence and security chain that keeps British citizens safe. It will pay the painful consequence of this action.
I disagree. Political maneuverings, intelligence and security are all intertwined. They always have been. The pols posture while the intelligence and security folks fight over territorial prerogatives. Sometimes it’s amazing that things don’t turn out worse than they do. In this case, there could well be a distinct disconnect between what British intelligence wants (and knows) and what the politicians are saying publicly. We won’t know until the main players write their memoirs.
This was a political decision, not an intelligence or security one.
Millibrand is a shrewd politician. Clobbering Israel will win him valuable brownie points as he makes a run for the leadership of the Labour Party after Gordon Brown’s anticipated loss in the upcoming British General Election.
Meanwhile, there has been nothing proved in the Dubai claim regarding Mossad. It is a situation in which no response can be made and none would be accepted. Or rather, what Dubai wants Israel to claim would be suicide for Israel.
He knows the colour of his constituents. His announcement in the House of Commons against Israel will play to the Left wing of his party and to the Muslim population who will now see him as yet another dhimmi Jew serving their cause.
As I’ve said before, Israel is the West’s canary in the coal mine. We would be best served if the canary is protected from the poison gas emanating from her enemies. Why? Because Israel is the only canary. We can't go to the small state store and buy another one. So if the only democracy in the Middle East were to fail, the rest of the actors in that region would immediately begin killing one another. They know that and they know that Israel knows that and they know we know they know, etc.
Unfortunately, there are sufficient numbers of crazies among the Arab states (and Iran) that enlightened self-interest may not be enough to stay the hands of all of them.
Meanwhile, the fuzzy beards and baseball caps and quick changes on those videos are some strange stuff. It’s as though someone in the Middle East was playing Mossad as they thought Mossad might carry out an assassination. That’s one idea I’ve seen floated, though I find it a leaky boat. Entertaining, though.
Mossad can’t be that stupid - or that wasteful of human intel to use eleven operatives to go after one man. As a matter of fact, he wasn’t even high on their hit list so why would they destroy eleven agents to go after an ostensibly low-value target?
Mr Shaw has some suggestions about this operation and the value of its target here. He talks about a computer disc in Britain that went missing last year. Never found. He asks if the Arabs had it and if Dubai used it…see what you think.
As I said, we won’t know the reality for a long time. All we can do is judge and guess.
Judge away, dear reader, but if you do it via the comment thread, stay reasonable. -
The political wife's small step from appendage to trophy | Deborah Orr
[Guardian] (Politics: Labour | guardian.co.uk)Samantha Cameron and Sarah Brown project an effortless, gilded ideal of family lifeHow does a man demonstrate that he is great? If he presently leads the Conservatives or Labour, he'll be keen to suggest he must be great himself because he has such a great woman behind him.No one knows quite where the ubiquitous homily originated. But it was popularised by the feminist movement – not to emphasise the importance of acquiring a supportive help-meet, of course, but to point up the invisibility of ...
Samantha Cameron and Sarah Brown project an effortless, gilded ideal of family life
How does a man demonstrate that he is great? If he presently leads the Conservatives or Labour, he'll be keen to suggest he must be great himself because he has such a great woman behind him.
No one knows quite where the ubiquitous homily originated. But it was popularised by the feminist movement – not to emphasise the importance of acquiring a supportive help-meet, of course, but to point up the invisibility of female contributions to male achievement. Such contributions are no longer invisible – far from it. Yet no politician looking to burnish his greatness would now dare to suggest that the great woman behind him was a supportive helpmeet alone.
Judging from their choice of partners – and one is fulsomely invited to – Gordon Brown and David Cameron have very similar ideas about what a modern woman and wife should be. Both are proud that their wives carved out independent careers. Both like to pay tribute to the primacy of their wives in matters of childcare – although they are also careful to underline their belief in active fatherhood.
It would be sacrilege to suggest that the two women choose their clothing so carefully, and lavish attention on their hair and makeup, for any reason other than their personal satisfaction. But, given that the appearance of women in the public eye is so forensically scrutinised, both men must take some pleasure in the fact their gals are so very willing and able to play that game. Both, presumably, are also extremely grateful that no matter how admirable and ambitious their wives are "in their own right", they are never too busy to put the ambitions of their husbands first.
Can it have been merely serendipitous, the sudden emergence of an on-the-couch-talking Samantha Cameron, days before her latest pregnancy was announced? Probably not. This was good media management. The immediate clamour to hear from an erstwhile silent pre-election, baby-carrying leader's wife would have been deafening. By speaking before the main topic for discussion became public property, Mrs Cameron gained herself some privacy. There is general agreement that a new baby in the offing will do nothing to harm Mr Cameron's election prospects. But there is a certain amount of shyness about analysing just why that might be.
Partly it is natural reticence, of a kind all too unfamiliar in the present media landscape. New babies are wonderful, while the death of a child is unspeakably sad. Only a flinty soul could fail to feel happy for the Camerons, when they have endured such great misery. Bitter tirades about opportunistic conception would, in this situation, be tasteless in the extreme, as well as paranoically far-fetched. Anyway, there can be no doubt that the Camerons have made a hard choice, not an advantageous one.
I do understand that the couple have wealth, and that wealth buys much support in bringing up a family, but still . . . A more pragmatic decision might have been to maintain the familial status quo, what with the expectation that Dad's going to be up to his elbows saving broken Britain in a matter of weeks. I wouldn't fancy having a baby under the circumstances that Mrs Cameron has blithely taken on, and I find her self-assurance admirable.
It also has to be said there are plenty of men who would cavil at being thrown the curveball of an infant, just as they are looking forward to being the king of a troubled castle. Cameron is fond of declaring that family must come first, and in that respect he is putting his money where his mouth is. Yet there is an unsettling aspect to the vision that has been set before the electorate, of a family quite unfazed at the prospect of "having it all" – power, glamour, and the patter of tiny feet.
It is actually nothing new, this process whereby wives canvass for their husbands. Women were expected to get out on the stump long before they could take part in the political process, even by voting. In those days, it was assumed that women supported their husband's ambitions. The fact that women now feel the need to advertise their support is at least an admission that a sympathetic spouse is an advantage to be boasted of, rather than taken for granted. And yet, it is a small step forward, this progression of political wife from appendage to trophy.
For there can be no doubt that Mrs Cameron's choice works as an extension of her husband's policy stance, just as fortuitously as Sarah Brown's public relations expertise is useful in allowing her to work a reception in a way her husband cannot. Cameron is well known for his belief in the importance of traditional family structures as the primary building blocks of a healthy society, and he very much likes to play up this link. He's less keen publicise how close this observation comes to Thatcher's notorious declaration that "there is no such thing as society", which she qualified by adding, "there are individual men and woman, and there are families". Voters are exhorted in Conservative advertisements to take a look at the party's policy proposals for the family. Yet those policies are pretty thin.
There will be an end to the couple penalty in the tax credit system, along with a reform of the administration of tax-credits more generally, to "reduce fraud and over-payment". There will be a refocusing of Sure Start, so it reaches only the most needy families. There will be continued commitment to the provision of free nursery care, along with a "review" of the way the childcare industry is regulated. There will be more flexible parental leave, and "stable" funding for relationship support – which couples will be given "greater encouragement to use".
It is notable that barely any of this does anything other than tweak or reorganise initiatives that have already been firmly embraced by Labour. These policies don't place families at the heart of society – economic society in particular. They instead attempt, slightly, to mitigate the difficulties of parents whose background and circumstances dump them closer to the margins of society – far away from the effortless, gilded ideal that both party leaders project from their own family arrangements.
That ideal declares that part of being a man who has it all is having a wife who has it all too, including a man worth standing behind. This may not represent an intellectually proven political consensus about the place of women in contemporary society. But it surely explains why there is such widespread discomfort about the prominence of wifely helpmeets in the wrangle over which man gets to strut the corridors of power.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Blackburn Rovers 2-1 Birmingham City | Premier League match report
[Soccer, Guardian] (Football news, match reports and fixtures | guardian.co.uk)There was a time when assorted pundits predicted that England's 2010 World Cup campaign would be constructed around David Dunn's vision and creativity. Those days are long gone and such opinions quietly forgotten. Should the Blackburn midfielder journey to South Africa this summer, it will be as a tourist rather than a member of Fabio Capello's squad but Birmingham swiftly discovered Dunn is far from a spent force.On an evening illuminated by two of the Premier League's more mercurial talents, D ...
There was a time when assorted pundits predicted that England's 2010 World Cup campaign would be constructed around David Dunn's vision and creativity. Those days are long gone and such opinions quietly forgotten. Should the Blackburn midfielder journey to South Africa this summer, it will be as a tourist rather than a member of Fabio Capello's squad but Birmingham swiftly discovered Dunn is far from a spent force.
On an evening illuminated by two of the Premier League's more mercurial talents, Dunn and Birmingham's James McFadden, the former scored twice and had another eye-catching effort controversially disallowed while McFadden also struck with a venomous free-kick.
It was not enough to prevent a suddenly stuttering Birmingham slipping to another defeat as Blackburn took a major stride toward banishing any lingering relegation fears. "We're not mathematically safe yet," said Sam Allardyce. "But I think we can start looking up not down."
Alex McLeish was left shaking his head. "We totally dominated a lot of the game, David Dunn's a good player though," said Birmingham's manager.
Allardyce is a little miffed with those Rovers fans who appeal in vain for him to configure his team in an attack-minded 4-4-2 formation. "It is an antiquated system," he snorted. "It doesn't work in the Premier League any more."
It took only five minutes before Dunn's scoring burst from the home midfield quintet served to vindicate his manager's debatable case. When a long forward punt was controlled superbly by Nikola Kalinic, Dunn accelerated smoothly forward before half-volleying Kalinic's ball beyond Joe Hart with his left foot.
For a short spell after that Dunn's old team looked distinctly wobbly but, gradually, McLeish's players pulled themselves together. Jason Brown, deputising for the injured Paul Robinson in Blackburn's goal, performed wonders to repel a deceptively curving McFadden shot.
Sometimes operating as an orthodox striker alongside Cameron Jerome and sometimes dropping considerably deeper into a Dunn-esque midfield role, McFadden's clever movement saw Allardyce's centre-halves, Christopher Samba and the 18-year-old Phil Jones, fully extended.
Not about to be upstaged, Dunn continued to exert an even more debilitating effect on Birmingham's defence, regularly feinting to go right before veering left. While one inspired interchange with El Hadji Diouf will linger in the memory, he alsobegan celebrating a second goal after another late, visionary, dash into the box to score with a stunning volley.Unfortunately, though, that effort was disallowed for Michel Salgado's foul on Lee Bowyer in the build-up. Furious, Dunn exchanged harsh words with Salgado as his team-mates trooped off at half-time.
McFadden seized a little of the second-half limelight. When Birmingham won a free-kick just outside the area after Morten Gamst Pedersen's foul on Johnson it seemed ideally positioned for delivery by the forward's left foot. Sure enough a swipe of that boot from McFadden sent the ball arcing over Allardyce's crumbling wall before dropping perfectly into the far bottom corner. Brown did not move, remaining rooted to his line at the near post.
A personal gauntlet had been thrown down and, when Diouf whipped in a corner, Dunn threw himself forwards to head beyond Hart from close range. McLeish claimed the corner was not taken from the quadrant but Allardyce merely shrugged.
"The difference tonight was David's outstanding quality," he said. "He should have had a hat-trick, his volley shouldn't have been disallowed. It was a great shame a finish as good as that didn't stand."
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Budget 2010: Did Darling play a blinder, or was it just another own goal?
[Politics, Guardian] (Politics news, UK and world political comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk)David Cameron says budget is proof UK has been relegated from the Premier League – but stamp duty cut is a hitBritain has been relegated to the bottom of the Conference from the top of the Premier League during 13 "wasted years" that have wrecked the economy, David Cameron claimed today.In his fifth response to a budget, the Tory leader warned that Labour had run out of money and run out of ideas, as it copied Conservative policies.Cameron reeled off a series of statistics to show that Labour ...
David Cameron says budget is proof UK has been relegated from the Premier League – but stamp duty cut is a hit
Britain has been relegated to the bottom of the Conference from the top of the Premier League during 13 "wasted years" that have wrecked the economy, David Cameron claimed today.
In his fifth response to a budget, the Tory leader warned that Labour had run out of money and run out of ideas, as it copied Conservative policies.
Cameron reeled off a series of statistics to show that Labour has turned a £6bn deficit it inherited in 1997 into a record £167bn deficit, nearly double the amount which forced Denis Healey to apply for an IMF loan in 1976.
"We've gone from the top of the Premier League to the bottom of the Conference in 13 wasted years – and it's time to sack the manager," Cameron said, as he mocked the prime minister's failure to secure an appearance in front of the country's football fans. "No wonder Match of the Day didn't want him."
Against this background, Gordon Brown was urging voters to "stick with what you know", Cameron said. "It's like the captain of the Titanic saying 'let me command the lifeboats'," he added.
"It's like Robert Maxwell saying 'let me reinvest your pension'. It's like Richard Nixon saying 'I'm the man to clean up politics'. Does the prime minister really expect the British people to turn around and say 'thank you' for nearly bankrupting the economy?"
Cameron highlighted three announcements: cutting stamp duty for homes worth less than £250,000, plans to tax super-strength cider, and expanding university places – which he said were all Tory ideas.
"Labour's big idea is a stamp duty cut on homes worth less than £250,000," he said. "Wherever did they get that one from? That's been Tory policy for three years. He came in as chancellor, copying our inheritance tax cut. He leaves as chancellor copying our stamp duty cut. The only new ideas in British politics are coming from this side of the house. The only things Labour bring are debt, waste and taxes."
The record level of borrowing will now mean that British politics resorts to a traditional pattern, even though the forecast for fiscal deficit this year has been reduced from £178bn to £167bn, or £163bn according to the treasury.
Cameron said: "We're meant to be impressed that it's turned out a few billion lower than the last disastrous forecast, but it is still more than every single previous Labour government has borrowed – put together. Like every Labour government before them, they've run out of money and they're leaving it to the next Conservative government to clean up the mess."
The Tories later depicted the budget, which was free of major tax announcements, as "empty". One senior shadow cabinet minister said: "This is the do-nothing budget. It is empty. It is the day that Gordon Brown's premiership was found out."
The Tories identified two aspects from the budget red book which showed that Labour was committed to increasing taxes and boosting spending:
• People paying income tax will, in effect, face a tax increase from next month because all personal allowances are to be frozen at £6,475. This is because inflation was minimal last September, the date used to judge the level of personal tax allowances, while inflation was 3.7% in the year to February. The Tories claim this will gain the Treasury £2.2bn in 2010-11 and £2.8bn in 2011-12 – the single biggest tax rise in the budget. George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, said: "Thirty million working people will be hit by this new Labour stealth tax. The chancellor said nothing about the biggest tax rise in the budget. That tells you everything you need to know about Labour's cynical tricks and their priorities."
• Britain's contribution to the EU will double, from £3bn in 2008-09 to £6.6bn in 2010-11, because of the weakness of the pound and because the government backdated a reduction in Britain's budget rebate.
Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, said Alistair Darling was in denial about the scale of cuts needed to stabilise the public finances. "The prime minister may have wanted a giveaway budget, what we got was a given-up budget," he said. "This isn't the preface to a new government but a footnote to 13 years of failure. We need real change. We needed a budget that gave us honesty on spending and fairness on taxation. We got neither.
"This budget was a budget in denial about the scale of change needed – about as honest as the CV of Stephen Byers. It's built on growth figures that are unlikely to materialise. It's built on false comfort from a small drop in borrowing that doesn't affect the structural deficit."
Clegg, who said the Lib Dems had put their cards on the table by identifying an initial instalment of £15bn of cuts, said the government was wrong to laud the cut in the fiscal deficit. "This government still came in £167bn over budget last year," he said. "We aren't better off. We are just ever so slightly less worse off."
In his last Commons speech before standing down at the election, John McFall, the Labour chairman of the Treasury select committee, called for public spending to be cut carefully despite pressure from "deficit hawks". McFall said: "Of course, tackling the deficit is going to have to happen and, perhaps more importantly, it has to be seen to be happening ... but we must ensure that the timing is right. We must ensure that we do not crowd out private sector growth with too much debt-fuelled public sector spending. But the dangers are equally treacherous on the other side: if the private sector is so sickly ... we risk losing more people to unemployment."
The former Tory cabinet minister John Redwood said the government was "playing with 0.1% of national income" because the budget provided a £1.4bn stimulus to a £1.4tn economy. "It was the dither and fiddle budget."
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
George Osborne gets ready to outline Tory tax and spending plans
[Politics, Guardian] (Politics news, UK and world political comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk)Shadow chancellor will set out plans to recognise marriage in the tax system but will want to avoid the sort of shadow budget that sunk Labour in 1992My new best friend Alastair Campbell wrote an excellent blog today on how budget day is a nightmare for the leader of the opposition who has to do his weekly turn at PMQs and then respond to the chancellor.David Cameron put in a punchy performance today. A few hours later, after the Tory treasury team had time to pore over the details in the Red Bo ...
Shadow chancellor will set out plans to recognise marriage in the tax system but will want to avoid the sort of shadow budget that sunk Labour in 1992
My new best friend Alastair Campbell wrote an excellent blog today on how budget day is a nightmare for the leader of the opposition who has to do his weekly turn at PMQs and then respond to the chancellor.
David Cameron put in a punchy performance today. A few hours later, after the Tory treasury team had time to pore over the details in the Red Book, the party delivered its political judgment on the budget. A senior member of the shadow cabinet said:
This is the do nothing budget. It is empty. It is the day that Gordon Brown's premiership was found out.
George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, has a strong record on calling Labour's budgets. A few hours after Gordon Brown's last budget as chancellor in 2007, Osborne dismissed it as a "tax con" after spotting that a cut in the basic rate of income tax from 22p to 20p would be funded by -- yes -- removing the 10p tax rate. That was a mistake that cost Labour dear.
Having dismissed this year's budget, attention will soon turn to the Tories' own plans. The Tories confirmed today they would outline tax and spending plans in these three areas before the election:
• How they will recognise marriage in the tax system.
• Whether they will scrap all or part of the national insurance contributions (NICs) increases due to be introduced in April 2011.
• Further "in year" spending cuts to be introduced this year to show the Tories are serious about tackling Britain's £163bn fiscal deficit earlier than Labour.
The big challenge now facing Osborne is how to do this without falling into the trap that sunk Labour's general election campaign in 1992 when the late John Smith held his notorious shadow budget.
Smith wanted to show that Labour, which was associated with profligacy from its previous period in office, would be responsible. He ended up gifting the Tories their notorious "tax bombshell" attack as it became clear that Middle England would suffer.
Osborne, too, wants to show that he would be responsible, most notably in tackling the fiscal deficit. A failure to do so early could lead to a loss of economic sovereignty, as he argued in the Mais lecture last month.
But is Osborne in danger of repeating John Smith's mistake by outlining too much detail, thereby handing his opponents handy ammunition? One senior Labour figure says the Tories are making the same mistake as Labour in 1992 -- mistaking tactics for strategy:
Labour in 1992 was all about tactics and had no coherent strategy. There is a big lesson from 1992. Remember John Smith's shadow budget. It was Labour's weakness because the party had an incoherent project then.
Labour says all three areas to be tackled in Osborne's non shadow budget are inspired by tactics. Recognising marriage and making (modest) changes to Labour's NICs increases are designed to appease the right.
On spending cuts, the Tories are trying to deflect criticism that their relatively small plans for £1.5bn of cuts this year fail to match their rhetoric about the threat of a Greek style fiscal crisis in Britain unless tough action is taken. No doubt they will have clocked this morning Ipsos Mori poll which shows, according to Patrick Wintour's blog, that only 30% agree that the debt is the greatest threat to thre economy.
The Tories believe Labour's criticism is nonsense because they believe they have been consistent for years on the economy. They say they first saw off the right by saying back in 2006 that fiscal responsibility would come before tax cuts. They say they have set the agenda in the past year by forcing Brown to talk about debt and spending cuts.
We'll probably only know if Osborne has avoided the Smith trap when he stands up to outline his plans. If he takes to the stage at the Institute of Civil Engineers at One Great George Street then maybe history will repeat itself. That is where Smith delivered his shadow budget on 16 March 1992.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Budget 2010: Only public intervention can rebuild a wrecked economy | Seumas Milne
[Politics, Guardian] (Politics news, UK and world political comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk)Cameron has no credible alternative to Labour's budget, which itself falls far short of what's needed to beat the private slumpIt might sound sacrilegious on a day like this, but budgets aren't generally that important. Once in a while, chancellors have used them to set a course that shapes an era, as Geoffrey Howe and Nigel Lawson did at huge social cost in the 80s. But those are rare. For all the media razzmatazz, the big economic decisions and announcements are almost always made elsewhere.In ...
Cameron has no credible alternative to Labour's budget, which itself falls far short of what's needed to beat the private slump
It might sound sacrilegious on a day like this, but budgets aren't generally that important. Once in a while, chancellors have used them to set a course that shapes an era, as Geoffrey Howe and Nigel Lawson did at huge social cost in the 80s. But those are rare. For all the media razzmatazz, the big economic decisions and announcements are almost always made elsewhere.
In terms of the scale and significance of its tax and spending changes, Alistair Darling's budget today was definitely in the latter mould. But as a demonstration of the impact of state intervention in the face of the failure of private enterprise, the exposure of the Conservatives' lack of a credible economic alternative and the distance New Labour has travelled under the pressure of the greatest crisis since the 1930s, it was a lesson in what is now at stake.
You don't have to be any kind of fan of Gordon Brown's government to recognise that, as Darling spelled out, unemployment, repossessions and bankruptcies are well below what was expected – and lower than during the recessions of the 1980s and 1990s, precisely because of the scale of government action, fiscal stimulus, public takeovers and investment that David Cameron and George Osborne have so consistently opposed.
The result is that the deficit and borrowing have also been lower and tax receipts higher than forecast, which should be the clearest possible warning to those who insist that cuts, rather than growth, are the route out of public debt. Of course, Brown and Tony Blair's enthusiasm for neoliberal deregulation made the impact of the crisis far worse in Britain, while the Conservatives have been on the wrong side of the argument both before and since the crash.
Meanwhile, the disintegration of New Labour, a political confection of the boom years, has been dramatised this week by the exposure of three of its most unashamed champions – former Blairite cabinet ministers Stephen Byers, Patricia Hewitt and Geoff Hoon – trying to sell their contacts in government to phantom corporate clients.
Compared with the scandal of the revolving-door corruption that has seen nearly 40 ex-New Labour ministers walk out of government jobs to work soon after for private companies bidding for state contracts and privatisated services – in some cases, the very firms they had earlier dealt with in government – this is relatively small beer.
But as one New Labour shibboleth after another, from nationalisation to higher taxes on the rich, has fallen under the pressure of the crisis, it has certainly underlined the price of the corporate embrace that has been its lodestar from its inception (and the Conservatives', naturally, long before that).
What will replace New Labour, still alive and well at the heart of government, remains unclear. Darling's resistance to the clamour for accelerated cuts and the budget's headline measures of a green investment bank, investment incentives and an extension of the job guarantee for young people all pointed in the right direction. Even if the cut in stamp duty for first-time buyers is hard to justify from an economic point of view, paying for it with increased duty on million pound-plus houses sends a powerful electoral message.
Despite the Tories' apparent success in turning the public deficit, rather than private slump, into the greatest crisis facing the country, the signs are that many voters are still unconvinced. Polling results depend on how the question is asked, but both Politics Home and Ipsos Mori have carried out polls this month showing voters opposed to early spending cuts by a margin of nearly two to one. Fear of Cameron's cuts in turn seems to have fed into the shrinking Conservative poll lead.
But the budget also underlined the limits of Brown and Darling's cautious Keynesianism and how much further they would need to intervene to rebuild the economy and head off pressure for a savage retrenchment of their own. Despite the government's stated opposition to early cuts, they have in fact already begun, in the guise of billions of pounds' worth of "efficiencies" and "economies", as today's strikes by civil service workers drove home.
Britain is the only G8 member to have withdrawn its stimulus and begun a fiscal tightening before any recovery is established, only marginally relaxed yesterday despite the room opened up by lower borrowing estimates. The post-election plans, meanwhile, envisage deep real-terms spending cuts over the next five years.
Measures to restructure and diversify the economy are of course welcome. But set against the scale of the collapse in private investment – at £46bn, nearly 60% of the fall in national income over the last two years – a £2bn green investment fund (the French equivalent is worth £18bn) will hardly dent the problem. The Treasury's own figures show investment incentives to business are less than half as effective in their economic impact as direct public investment.
Only public investment in transport and green infrastructure, housing and education, can fill the gap. But that is set to fall sharply under current government plans. At the same time, Darling has resisted pressure to boost the tax take from the wealthy and reaffirmed his determination to sell off the public stakes in RBS and Lloyds at exactly the time when he should be directing them (rather than agreeing another set of targets) to finance new public investment and drive up lending to business.
Given the weakness of the economy and the threat of a double-dip recession, more radical measures are clearly going to have to be taken. But judging from Cameron's response to the budget, the Tories are in a deeper denial than anyone else and still expecting to win the election by default, on the back of Brown's unpopularity and the mood of time-for-a-change.
Labour's bigger, largely unacknowledged problem is that living standards for the majority are again being squeezed, as prices outstrip earnings by a factor of three by some measures. In more than 30 years of elections, ruling parties have lost when real wages are falling and an opposition party only won once, in 1997, when real wages were rising.
Whoever forms the government, we are entering a period of social and political conflict about how to reconstruct the economy and who will pay the cost of the market frenzy that wrecked it. The contours of that contest are only now becoming clear.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Letters: Women and inclusive politics
[Politics, Guardian] (Politics news, UK and world political comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk)Anne Perkins hits the nail on the head in her article about the near absence of women from the UK political landscape (Let us hear about political women, not politicians' wives, 24 March). The media focus on politicians' wives highlights the degree to which conventional attitudes about gender roles still hamper our perceptions of women in the public sphere.Sarah Brown's fashion sense or Samantha Cameron's pregnancy should not distract attention from the fact that fewer than 20% of Westminster MP ...
Anne Perkins hits the nail on the head in her article about the near absence of women from the UK political landscape (Let us hear about political women, not politicians' wives, 24 March). The media focus on politicians' wives highlights the degree to which conventional attitudes about gender roles still hamper our perceptions of women in the public sphere.
Sarah Brown's fashion sense or Samantha Cameron's pregnancy should not distract attention from the fact that fewer than 20% of Westminster MPs are female. Such underrepresentation means that the politicians still do not reflect the population as a whole. This gender disparity makes our parliament one of the most unrepresentative in Europe, and puts us below countries such as Afghanistan, Rwanda and Cuba in the percentage of female MPs.
The next government must address why women continue to be underrepresented in the political and business worlds. We need to see positive action measures being brought in to increase the numbers of women in parliament. The Greens also support the introduction of a law to ensure that boards of major companies are at least 40% female, following the successful model in Norway.
In the Brighton Pavilion constituency, where I'm standing, women have really come to the fore – in fact it's an all-female contest. Millicent Fawcett, whose husband Henry represented Brighton in the 1870s, was instrumental in getting women the vote. Let's hope that we can make good on her legacy by a push for equal representation.
Caroline Lucas MEP
• Europe 2020 is the EU's new strategy for growth and employment. It is a crucial challenge for the EU, with its ageing population, to get more women into work. The Swedish government has worked hard for the inclusion of a gender equality perspective in the growth strategy. We must start to speak openly about women's employment.
Millions of women in the EU cannot work because they are responsible for their family. From an economic point of view, this does not make sense. More women in work would mean higher GDP and thus higher tax revenue. In the EU, an average of just six in 10 women are in paid employment. Four times as many women as men work part-time. Men earn almost 20% more, which affects women's future pensions and limits their economic freedom.
We want Europe 2020 to include a specific target on more women in paid employment. The EU has a clear vision of women and men having the same opportunities to combine working life, private life and family life. Efforts to move out of the economic crisis must go hand in hand with efforts to create a gender-equal Europe. The EU cannot afford to have the world's best-educated housewives.
Birgitta Ohlsson, Sweden's minister for EU affairs
Anders Borg, Sweden's minister for finance
• Nils Pratley points out that David Cameron's unilateral policy on a banking levy won't help UK taxpayers – but maybe it's the only option he has (Viewpoint, 23 March). The Conservative party used to be proud of its internationalist outlook, but the party has become ever more insular – resulting last year in Cameron's decision to cut himself off from Europe's mainstream centre-right. Instead of working with Merkel and Sarkozy, Conservatives in the European parliament have been forced into an alliance with fringe parties who carry little weight. At a time when international co-operation matters most, the Conservative leader has little to offer but to go it alone.
Labour group leader, European parliament
• Every citizen has a stake in the future of this country, so campaigns like Operation Black Vote are to be applauded (Report, 24 March). Another group who also deserve their say are the half a million people with learning disabilities who are eligible to vote, but find politics complex and alienating. Less jargon, simpler language and better use of visual aids would not only help people with learning disabilities to understand politics better, but also people with low literacy, visual impairments and, indeed, all of us.
Su Sayer
Chief executive, United Response
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Budget 2010: Political but not profligate | Editorial
[Politics, Guardian] (Politics news, UK and world political comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk)No big headline measures, and tough decisions on cuts deferred - a smart budget from a chancellor with few optionsAlistair Darling yesterday asked the British to pull up the duvet, keep out the recessionary chill and refuse to panic. It was a keep-calm-and-carry-on budget, a trust-the-government budget, clear in its political logic and awkward for the opposition to challenge – as David Cameron demonstrated with his wavering response. There was little sign of the lumbering partisanship preferre ...
No big headline measures, and tough decisions on cuts deferred - a smart budget from a chancellor with few options
Alistair Darling yesterday asked the British to pull up the duvet, keep out the recessionary chill and refuse to panic. It was a keep-calm-and-carry-on budget, a trust-the-government budget, clear in its political logic and awkward for the opposition to challenge – as David Cameron demonstrated with his wavering response. There was little sign of the lumbering partisanship preferred by the prime minister. Contrary to the predictions of a pre-election spendfest, there was only a very small giveaway – about £1.5bn in staggered fuel-duty increases and measures to help first-time buyers into the housing market – and, crucially, they were all paid for over the long term. Political? Of course. Profligate? No. And then there was the chancellor's nifty footwork around a series of truly awful economic figures – helped by the fact that he could claim them to be slightly less awful than predicted last December.
Gordon Brown, it was suggested beforehand, would dictate this budget over the garden fence to Number 11. Instead its subtle positioning bore the hallmarks of Peter Mandelson's political intelligence. But in its coherence and lack of empty boasting, yesterday's speech bore some of the low-key likeability of Mr Darling himself. In one sense this budget was boring, offering only a slight lessening of the state of national alarm unaccompanied by any big decisions. But such steadfastness may prove a solid electoral defence against the Conservatives. The opposition, with its talk of austerity, risks offering change for the worse. Some voters, at least, may plump for the limited comforts of the current situation.
Red meat
This was enough red meat to win over Labour MPs. The chancellor's dig at Lord Ashcroft's tax status – announcing information will be exchanged with Belize –was cleverly done. It was hardly, whatever more excitable commentators might claim, a soak-the-rich budget – but it was more openly daring than New Labour were before the crash. That gives Labour something to campaign for, an achievement in Britain's reduced circumstances. Because what was laid out yesterday was as clear a case as any of the Brown cabinet has yet made for government intervention in the running of the economy.
Old taboos
Mr Darling began his speech by listing examples of government intervention over the last couple of years – the bailout of Northern Rock, the billions of extra government spending – which he rightly pointed out had all been opposed by the Tories and yet plainly helped avert a re-run of the Great Depression. What he did not say was that these measures would also have been unthinkable to any member of Tony Blair's government; but the banking crisis has helped Labour ministers see that what might once have seemed taboos – such as closer regulation of markets, or greater management of the economy – were neither electoral anathema nor daffy 70s throwbacks after all.
To that end, the most interesting part of the budget lies in Mr Darling's proposals to set up a green investment bank to build offshore windfarms and other essential low-carbon infrastructure. True, with an initial float of £2bn, the bank will need to operate on Lehman levels of leverage to have much of an impact. After all, campaigners estimate that £750bn will be needed over the next few decades to build green infrastructure – and even with significant changes to regulations and incentives, the private sector is hardly going to provide all of that. But ministers talk of this as being only the start.
If so, and if the green investment bank becomes a real going concern then yesterday afternoon's speech may mark the moment when Labour finally accepted that government could do more in spurring long-term growth than enabling low interest rates, bringing down taxes and sitting on its hands. That combination is a large part of the reason why the UK economy is now so disastrously lopsided – with private-sector jobs and prosperity ever more concentrated in the City and the south-east; and the former industrial heartlands of the north-east and Wales reliant on the public sector to create employment. As chancellor, Gordon Brown used his budgets to divert more money towards child poverty and working family tax credits. Mr Darling did his bit for winter-fuel payments for pensioners – but the longest stretch in his speech was about industrial activism: not just funding for green projects but measures to support small and medium-sized businesses. Strange territory for a modern Labour chancellor, perhaps, but absolutely essential to rebuilding Britain's broken economy. Again, he could have gone further: those nationalised high-street banks have not lent enough money to otherwise sound small companies and the new lending targets announced yesterday will not give bank executives much to worry about
Choices to come
Then again, it may be testimony to Mr Darling's success that a budget which was set to be judged by how much it fleshed out plans to bring down borrowing and placated bond investors was soon being discussed in the chancellor's own terms. Just weeks before an election, he was never likely to spell out plans for spending cuts, and he duly stuck to high-falutin' talk about efficiency savings and relocating civil servants out of Whitehall. But he also refused to turn the surprise undershoot on public debt as a pre-election warchest. Only the windfall levy on bankers' bonuses was used for that.
This was a budget without big headline measures for Labour activists to tour around constituency doorsteps – and it was also one that deferred the tough decisions on cuts until after the election. There were no obvious diving lines here, unless it was in framing the government's largely admirable record over the past two turbulent years in terms of trust and competence. That was a smart move for a chancellor without many options.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Marriage: the new minority pursuit
[Politics, Guardian] (Politics news, UK and world political comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk)The number of weddings is at an all-time low and marriage is a hot election issue. So what do people getting married think of this political interferance? Amelia Gentleman spends two days at a London register office to find outThere is a moment sometime around 3.40 when the bride, Clare Ingram, repeats the words, "I do solemnly declare that I know not of any lawful impediment" in a husky voice, her eyes fixed on the groom's. The guests sitting on the left in the largest of Marylebone register o ...
The number of weddings is at an all-time low and marriage is a hot election issue. So what do people getting married think of this political interferance? Amelia Gentleman spends two days at a London register office to find out
There is a moment sometime around 3.40 when the bride, Clare Ingram, repeats the words, "I do solemnly declare that I know not of any lawful impediment" in a husky voice, her eyes fixed on the groom's. The guests sitting on the left in the largest of Marylebone register office's rooms cannot see her expression, but will have noticed her bare back shaking. Facing them is the tearful face of the groom, Darren Coleman, who has already refused the box of tissues proffered by the registrar. An unexpected croak in the registrar's voice suggests that she too is close to being overwhelmed by the contagious sense of excitement that has rippled through the room.
If it were possible to capture and bottle this moment, the product would be a potent weapon in the Conservative party's campaign to restore marriage as a central pillar in family life. Crystallised into these seconds are all the sentiments of gravity, happiness, certainty, of profound commitment that advocates of marriage would like more of us to experience.
One of the few clear lines of division between the Labour party and the Conservatives, marriage has become one of the central themes of the next election. As he struggled to shake off news of a dwindling poll lead, David Cameron earlier this month once again restated his promise to introduce tax breaks for married couples as a way of boosting support.
But in the dimly lit, wood-panelled corridors of Marylebone register office in central London, the business of marriage is thriving for reasons that have nothing to do with any possible future tax incentive. Over a Friday and Saturday in February, the office has 15 marriages booked, an increase on last year. Attendance here bucks the national trend of a declining desire to be married, partly because the location is central and the rooms are stately, and partly because Liam Gallagher and two of the Beatles were married here. The Beatles tour bus still stops outside the building, megaphones paying tribute to the union of Paul McCartney and Linda Eastman.
The busy office is atypical, but meeting some of the people who make their way here over two days to exchange vows nevertheless offers an insight into modern marriage. The institution has been drifting away from a mainstream activity for decades, and while it isn't yet an eccentricity to get married, it is increasingly a minority pursuit. The people who choose to get married this spring are taking a defiantly counter-cultural step.
Figures released by the Office of National Statistics last month show that, in 2008, marriage rates in England and Wales fell to the lowest level since they were first calculated in 1862. There were 232,990 marriages in 2008, 35,000 fewer than a decade earlier. Since 1981, the number of marriages conducted annually has fallen by a third. If divorce rates have fallen, it is largely because there are fewer marriages to untangle.
The noticeboards that hang outside Room 46 (Marriage Enquiries) record the bare skeletons of dozens of love affairs. Every two-lined, typed notice of intent to get married gives the name, age, address and profession of the two individuals – offering the briefest hint of how their relationship was forged, and how each couple has come to the decision to spend their lives together.
Graeme, a money broker, is to marry Chynara, a student, and their marriage will be solemnised in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. Alistair and Francesca (both bankers in their early 30s) will be married at the Castell'Arquato in northern Italy (Italian law dictates that the banns must be posted in the couple's place of residence). A company director (born in 1975, previous marriage dissolved) will marry a company secretary (born in 1980). A hospital porter will marry a student. A landscape architect will marry an estate manager. A psychiatrist will marry a dermatologist. A hotel night manager will marry a customer service assistant. A dental assistant will marry a London taxi driver.
The Conservatives believe that marriage has become a middle-class phenomenon, but these marriage banns record partnerships from all professions, with individuals travelling from all over the world – Nigeria, Lithuania, Sweden, India: some single, some divorcees, some young, some widows.
At 10am, one of the registrars, wearing a freshly ironed black suit (the registrar's uniform), is complaining about the heavy smell of the new flowers, coughing and clearing her throat as she walks to the first ceremony in the Yellow Room. "These flowers always get to my throat, whenever they bring the fresh ones."
She comes out half an hour later, laughing; the groom had chosen his identical twin to be the witness. "Nice couple. First time I've had twins," she says. "I said, 'Which of you is wearing which tie? Be careful, I don't want to marry the wrong one.'"
Along the corridor, some late guests arrive for the marriage of a young Colombian woman who works in McDonald's to a Czech hotel night porter. They tiptoe across the grey marble, trying to make their high heels sound quieter, bending their knees at an awkward angle. A small group of people who have never met before gather outside the marriage room, laughing because they are late and all feel too shy to go in once the ceremony has started. One has changed on the way into vertiginous heels, and is carrying her trainers in a plastic bag.
A few minutes later the young bride comes out, her white dress trailing on the floor, its bodice expensively embroidered with beads, and her white gloves stretching above her elbows. The parents-in-law, who do not appear to speak a common language, smile happily for the photographs in the hall outside, beneath a dark and gloomy painting of a long-dead, bearded MP, Sir John Aird, first mayor of Paddington. One of the guests sings a wedding march as they clatter downstairs to the street.
Richard Oulahan, 32, and Iona Kleinen, 30Guests begin arriving for the wedding of Richard Oulahan to Iona Kleinen. Richard paces around the room speaking into a mobile phone which is on loudspeaker, describing the scene in Spanish in a conference call to his mother in the US and a cousin in Honduras – telling them about the flowers on the grey marble mantelpiece, the colour of his bride's dress (fuchsia and brown). There are two small babies in pushchairs, wedding presents dangling from the handlebars, who begin crying in unison as the ceremony begins.
The couple got engaged only a few weeks earlier, over New Year when Richard, an IT consultant, took Iona, a fashion buyer for River Island, on a surprise trip to the island of Iona – the Scottish island her parents named her after, a place she had never visited. They flew to Glasgow, took a three-hour train to Oban, a 45-minute ferry ride to the Isle of Mull, a one-and-a-half hour bus ride across Mull, and finally another 15-minute boat trip to Iona. "It took quite a bit of engineering," says Richard. "It is a godforsaken place in the middle of nowhere. She had no idea where we were going."
No shops, hotels or cafes were open in late December, so he rented a flat and packed enough food for three days in his suitcase, along with a ring, which he gave her when he managed to cajole her to the top of the island's highest peak at dusk on New Year's Day. In the three years that they had known each other, they had never discussed marriage, but Iona said yes immediately. Richard was so surprised that he asked her again. She said yes again, and they felt their way down the hillside by torchlight.
They both say that, on the surface, they have little in common. Richard is from Honduras but grew up in the US, and also has an Irish passport through family ties. Iona grew up in Britain. They were set up by a mutual friend who studied at law school with Richard. Was it love at first sight? Iona pauses and smiles uncertainly. "I don't think it was. We were two extremely different people who somehow clicked." He explains their differences by pointing out that she didn't have a personal email address when they met, whereas he had seven. "I couldn't fathom how someone could not have a personal email address. She is fashionable. I work in computers."
Proponents of marriage argue that it makes you richer and healthier, and guarantees that your children will be happier and more successful. A rightwing think-tank, the Centre for Social Justice, has published research claiming that the best outcomes for children are within "stable, healthy married relationships" and that children who do not grow up in a two-parent family are "75% more likely to fail educationally, 70% more likely to become addicted to drugs, and 50% more likely to have an alcohol problem". But the research is widely contested; the counter argument runs that people who marry are a self-selecting group, more disposed to commitment, more stable, so the figures are distorted by a chicken-and-egg effect.
Certainly, marriage is an important feature in both Richard and Iona's families. Her parents have been married for 40 years, and his for 39. "I believe relationships are stronger when people get married; there is more support," Iona says. "I suppose that is a slightly old-fashioned view." She thinks it is important to be married if you are thinking about having children: "I would feel the need for the stability that marriage offers."
She laughs at the idea that the prospect of tax breaks for married couples might have nudged them towards the register office. "Tax had no influence on making my decision, but I think it is a good thing for the government to encourage marriage," she says.
"I disagree," says Richard, with a half-smile of apology to his fiancee. "I think it demeans the idea of marriage. All of a sudden you are thinking about the practical reasons. I am essentially a practical person, but you are embarking on a journey in life which will have potential turmoil, ups and downs, and you need to weigh out all these aspects – not think about it in financial terms."
Richard is uncertain about how marriage will change his life. "I do feel like there is going to be a difference on a psychological level. I am not going to love her more because she is my wife. I love her enough already," he says, but in getting married he thinks he will gain "a partner to help navigate through life".
The registrar is used to people broadcasting the wedding to relatives all over the world via mobile phones and laptops, but before she begins she says: "Can you tell your mother not to speak during the wedding?" There is, nevertheless, a loud rustling and rattling noise from the telephone throughout the service, and when Richard says, "I, Richard, do call upon Iona to be my lawful wedded wife", everyone can hear his mother screaming "Oh my God!" down the telephone.
"This day will form a milestone in your lives," the registrar tells the couple, as bright winter sunshine falls through the tall windows. "You will look back upon it with love and happiness, as the start of a new phase in your lives together."
The party leaves the building to have tapas in a bar around the corner.
The registrar departs swiftly to conduct a civil partnership between two women in the next room. Later, in her office in a side room, Alison Cathcart, who has been a registrar for 22 years, says that no other job – except, perhaps, being a midwife – offers the chance to witness such life-changing moments.
"I do get a kick out of it," she says. "No other job gives you that feeling, when you've said those words, those immortal words – 'you are now husband and wife' – and you see the reaction. It is that amazing sense of happiness. You can see this sheer joy on people's faces."
From time to time, the registrars privately wonder if a marriage will survive, sensing a lack of certainty from one half of the couple, but it is very hard to judge. Coldness and restraint can often be a manifestation of nerves. The only low moments are the sham marriages, of which there are many fewer since the regulations were tightened a couple of years ago. "You can tell," Cathcart says. "If, for example, they don't speak each other's languages, they don't know each other's names. It happens. Or you ask where they met and they can't tell you. We have a duty to report it to the Home Office."
At the inquiries counter, Linda Campbell, 27, a charity worker who is being dispatched to work in Africa for a year, is paying by credit card for a ceremony in a few weeks' time that will marry her to her boyfriend of seven years, before she leaves the country. "He can't come with me because of his work, so we decided it was the right time to make this commitment," she says. "We want to spend the rest of our lives together, even if we are going to spend some time apart."
Linda does not believe that marriage offers a guarantee of happiness, and is dismissive of the idea of tax breaks for married couples as a way of strengthening society. "There are so many different models of relationships that can offer stability. I work with plenty of young people whose lives are awful and whose parents are married. I don't believe marriage is an answer to social ills. I believe it is a very deeply personal decision. It is something we have talked about for many years."
After she has left, a man comes in to ask how to arrange a civil partnership ceremony. "I am so nervous," he says, as he leans over the wooden counter. "Keep your nerves for the day," the registrar advises him.
Dwaign, 33, a customer service manager from Trinidad, says he will not be able to invite his family to the ceremony, because they don't know he is gay, but his partner's family will be there. "We are really, really in love. That's why we want to do this," he says.
The Conservatives have yet to spell out how their tax breaks for married couples will be structured, and have not made it clear whether the incentive will be extended to civil partnerships. Dwaign is unenthusiastic about the concept. "Marriage shouldn't be decided on by anyone except the two people. It is a big commitment. You shouldn't pressure anyone into doing it."
David Lu, 36, and Letitia Liu, 27
A couple of miles away in Soho's Chinatown, Letitia Liu and David Lu are still working at the Immigration Law Centre, where they both have jobs. It is the eve of their wedding and they are booked for a lunchtime marriage at Marylebone register office on Saturday, but are working the full week and will be back in the office on Monday. The ceremony in London is just a prelude to a bigger wedding in Beijing, sometime in the future when they can spare time away from the office.
They met when Letitia, a recent graduate in law and accountancy, came to ask David, an immigration lawyer, for professional advice about how to acquire permanent residency in the UK, her home since she arrived to study for her A-levels. He didn't give her much useful advice, but he did ask her out for dinner. That was 18 months ago, and David was certain very quickly that he had found the person he wanted to marry. "He has been asking me to marry him every day from the day we started a relationship," Letitia says. "Every day."
Getting married will end the sense of loneliness that she has felt living in a foreign country. "I came here when I was 17. For 10 years I have been on my own here. Getting married and buying a house will be like gaining a family. You are no longer alone."
Although David is very much in love, he points out that marriage is the fulfilment of a filial duty. "My parents think like most Chinese parents, that when their child gets married they have finished their work. For the last 10 years, every day I phone home and every day they ask: 'Have you found a girlfriend?' They are not joking – it is quite serious. They say: 'Shall we find you one? Shall we send you one?' They are always worrying about me."
David is excited about the marriage, and thinks their relationship will become stronger as a result. "I will be able to say I've got a wife now. It is better to be able to say, 'That is my wife' than 'That is my girlfriend.'"
"It will make him feel more safe," Letitia says, giving him a wry smile. She only relented recently to his barrage of proposals, swayed in part by advice that it would be more auspicious to be married before the Chinese new year. Her mother, whom she has consulted by telephone, thinks she is a little too young to make the commitment, but Letitia is certain her decision is the right one. She wants to marry David because, she says, of "the way he treats me: I feel good and I feel warm inside".
They already live together, but the act of getting married will somehow change their lives, David thinks. "Marriage is for life. We will have a stronger relationship. My father and mother will be pleased – I will telephone them and say, 'Now you don't need to worry any more.' I love her. She is a nice girl."
"Just a nice girl?" Letitia asks, laughing. David is wearing a woollen jumper in the same shade of purple as her shoes and tights. Both of them think it would be good if the government did more to promote marriage.
"In Chinese culture," Letitia says, "if you have a child before you get married then people will give you a very strange look. English people don't care; lots of English people have children but they don't marry. I don't know if that is a good thing. Maybe they think that marriage is just a certificate and not important. But we are more traditional. We think about what other people might be thinking."
David adds: "A lot of people here aged 40, 50 go out to pubs and clubs, looking for another woman or another man. Every day they are looking. That's a lot of stress. I don't want to spend my life drinking and looking for a girlfriend."
George Pasquel-Thompson, 31, and Paula Rendon-Estrada, 25
Paula Rendon-Estrada will marry George Pasquel-Thompson on Saturday in the slot after Letitia and David. They are sitting in a cafe at the bottom of the City insurance brokerage where he works, discussing final plans.
After the wedding, Paula, who is from Mexico, will be moving to London to live with George for the first time. After meeting three years ago at a party in a pub in east London, they have conducted a long-distance relationship; the longest time they have spent together was a two-week cruise on the Nile in Egypt a year ago.
Life will be radically different after the wedding, but if they are nervous they are concealing it well. They sit, hands entwined across the table, occasionally patting each other's forearm in a gently affectionate way.
"I want to get married because I love Paula and I love everything about her," George says, and they squeeze hands. "I'll get you a sick bucket in a minute," he adds, suddenly self-conscious.
He went to the trouble of asking her father six months ago whether he would give his permission for the marriage. "I had to try to say in Spanish that my intentions were honourable. I told him I didn't have a ring yet, but just wanted to see what he thought about me marrying his daughter. He hugged me. We didn't have much time. We were in a restaurant and Paula was in the ladies' room," he says.
Getting married is important for George because he grew up observing what he believes was an unusually happy marriage between his father, who worked in the Foreign Office, and his Ecuadorean mother. "I was 19 when he died. My mother was still very much in love with my father and still is today. He wrote her hundreds of letters and she kept them all. He wrote to every single family member he could think of until they were sick of him telling them how much he loved her."
George's own letters, or mainly emails, to Paula have been scrutinised by another generation of Foreign Office officials, who interviewed her to gauge whether the marriage was being undertaken for passport purposes. "I had to print out dozens of emails, our photos, bank statements," she says. "It should be enough to say I am marrying him because I love him. Unfortunately it is not like that. I think we managed to show them that we were genuinely in love."
Paula still lacks confidence in her English, and says she wants to pursue her "career specialisation in gastronomy" when she moves here. She believes "marriage means the good times, the bad times, sharing it all".
"I would have to agree strongly with Paula's interpretation of marriage," says George. He doesn't think the government should be working to promote marriage. "They should concentrate on larger things; it is up to the individual. I thought I was going to be a bachelor for ever. I thought it was nice not to have someone to rein you in. But that changed when I met Paula," he says. "You can reach for the bucket again."
Paula shines her eyes at her fiance. "He is the best guy in the whole world. It is really true."
Darren Coleman, 39, and Clare Ingram, 40
The last marriage of the day at Marylebone is also the biggest, and the large purple room quickly begins to fill up with friends and relatives of Clare Ingram, a call centre manager, and Darren Coleman, a courier controller who is hoping to become a taxi driver.
Several little boys are dressed in suits and tails that brush the ground, and there are girls in pretty pink dresses with roses. The adults are wearing fur coats and grey suits; a baby has been dressed in a long white wedding dress. A man at the far back has folded a newspaper into a manageable size, and does not stop reading. One girl is wearing a skirt so short that she is feeling uncomfortable, and keeps tugging it down at the back so her underwear doesn't show when she bends over.
Clare and Darren have known each other for five years and been engaged for three, but were prevented from marrying by a sense that the practical, financial side of their life was not ready. They had hoped to sell their houses and move in together, to make a fresh start after the wedding, but there were no buyers. One year stretched into three, and they still didn't feel ready to organise the wedding. It was only when they started making plans for Darren's 40th birthday that they decided now might be a good moment to marry.
"We have both been kind of laid-back," Clare says. "But I want to make a commitment to Darren. I have never felt so blessed to be with someone as I have with him."
Darren has been cautious about getting married, scarred by his parents' divorce. "I wouldn't want to do it willy-nilly because of what happened to my parents. Their divorce had a big impact on me," he says. "I have always wanted to be married. It will give us a bit more confidence for whatever plans we want to make for our future."
Clare comes from a Catholic background and she too has been cautious about getting married sooner because of her opposition to divorce. "I was brought up in an environment where you are pretty much married off for life. A marriage is there to work at," she says. "If we have children, I want to be a married lady." She will take her husband's name. "I shall be proud to be a Mrs Coleman," she says.
Three years of anticipation has heightened her excitement about the event. The couple are spending much more than they intended on the wedding and the reception, but they have no regrets. Everything has been meticulously planned, down to the flip-flops with "deirraM" and "tsuJ" indented on each sole which are packed in her going-away bag, so that when she walks along the Goan beaches, anyone who cares to study her footprints will know she is on honeymoon.
As she walks into the room, enveloped in a white veil and silk dress, everyone is silent and, later, even the registrar comments on what an impact her arrival had: "The groom completely lost it. She looked so beautiful. He was completely floored when she walked in. I really did catch my breath."
When the vows are over, Clare turns and waves to her friends and mouths "I'm married!" The moment of high emotional tension dissolves as the guests file out, to breathe in the Friday night rush-hour fumes on the Edgware Road.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Repeal Healthcare? Keep dreaming; The GOP is in desperate need of a civics lesson
[News] (True/Slant Network Activity)[1]Image by Fibonacci Blue via Flickr The continued Republican outrage at the Democrat's newly passed healthcare reform bill demonstrates two things: that the GOP was planning on the 2010 midterms being an electoral victory lap and that civics education is woefully lacking in the country's conservative party. It seems abundantly clear that repealing and resisting healthcare reform will be the GOP's signature issue for 2010. The ink is not yet dry on the nation's new Healthcare Policy and Re ...
[1]Image by Fibonacci Blue via Flickr The continued Republican outrage at the Democrat's newly passed healthcare reform bill demonstrates two things: that the GOP was planning on the 2010 midterms being an electoral victory lap and that civics education is woefully lacking in the country's conservative party. It seems abundantly clear that repealing and resisting healthcare reform will be the GOP's signature issue for 2010. The ink is not yet dry on the nation's new Healthcare Policy and Republicans are already geared up for a grand march towards its repeal. Senator Jim DeMint has introduced a bill [2] to the Senate to strike the measure which, just hours after the President signed the Senate bill into law, is festooned with a gaggle of co-sponsors including, as Eugene Kiely of USA Today informs us, "Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Robert Bennett of Utah, Kit Bond of Missouri, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Mike Crapo of Idaho, John Ensign of Nevada, Kay Bailey Hutchinson of Texas, James Inhofe of Oklahoma, George LeMieux of Florida, James Risch of Idaho, Pat Roberts of Kansas and David Vitter of Louisiana." Meanwhile Mitch McConnell is pledging that the Republican slogan will be "Repeal and Replace [3]" and, in the lower House, Michele Bachmann has taken it upon herself to introduce [4] a short bit of legislation paralleling Senator DeMint's. Which brings us to the matter of civics education. As any High School Senior can tell you, the Republicans can't overturn this law, not in 2010 anyway. This isn't a political prognostication; it's math. Overturning a law is no different than passing any other piece of legislation. The bill must make its way through both houses of Congress and across the President's desk. As Democrats learned after the Republican Revolution of 1994, however, the President's veto is not an insurmountable obstacle; a two-thirds majority of both houses of Congress can pass a bill over the objections of the White House. Needless to say, President Obama will oppose - staunchly - the repeal of his most significant domestic policy victory. Thus, if Republicans want to overturn healthcare reform, they will have to do so over the President's veto and that will require two thirds of both Houses. Two thirds of the House of Representatives is 290 votes; to reach that number Republicans will have to defend their existing 177 seats and win an addition 113 more, mostly from Democratic incumbents. Such an electoral victory is improbable but not impossible. Chalk one up for the audacity of obstructionism. Two thirds of the Senate, however, is 67 votes. The election of Senator Scott Brown put the GOP at 41 seats in the United States' Senate which means that the GOP must win an additional 26 seats from the Democrats in the 2010 race. This is not just improbable; it is impossible: only 18 Democratic seats are up for grabs in the 2010 race [5]. Even assuming a complete electoral sweep, the Republicans can - at most - hope to hold 59 seats in the 112th Congress' Senate. Yet, after a year of doomsaying and predictions of veritable apocalypse should Health Care Reform pass, the Republicans can not simply abandon the issue on the campaign trail and they certainly can't stump on a message of impotent incompetence. Increasingly desperate attempts to look at all relevant in the political arena have lead nearly more than a dozen Republican state-attorneys general to bring suit [6] challenging the constitutionality of the bill and pledges of resistance from several more. Zach Wamp, a candidate for Governor in Tennessee, promised to meet the federal government "at the state line," [7] while Virginia's Governor Bob McDonnell signed legislation declaring that Virginians are not required to purchase health insurance [8]. Clearly civics education is lacking at the state level as well. The lawsuits challenging the Constitutionality of Health Care Reform focus on the law's mandate which requires Americans to hold a health insurance policy or face a tax penalty. Critics charge that such a measure is outside the bounds of the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution, the section of Article I that gives the Congress the power to regulate commerce between the states. "We contend that if a person decides not to buy health insurance, that person – by definition – is not engaging in commerce," Cuccinelli said [9], "and therefore, is not subject to a federal mandate." Legal scholars are divided on what the Court's likely decision will be but even should the Court strike down the mandate provision that is all it can do; the rest of the law - unchallenged by any lawsuit - will stand and the result could destroy the health insurance market [10]. Pledges to resist the law at the state level are no better informed. State laws which directly contradict the recently passed Federal one are overruled by it per centuries old Supreme Court precedent set in McCulloch v Maryland [11] and pledges of less legislative resistance like that alluded to by Zach Wamp have historically ended badly; don't take my word for it, ask Jefferson Davis how that worked out for him. All of this is more than a little absurd, childish, and petulant yet the Republicans really have no choice in the matter. The GOP bet the house, as former Bush speechwriter David Frum [12] wrote, on "hysterical accusations and pseudo-information" and as a result of that they have convinced their base that Health Care Reform is the gravest danger facing America today. Conservative radio host Neil Bortz even went so far as to charge that "[health care reform] will do more damage than 9/11 [13]." The resulting ideological meltdown suffered by the GOP in the wake of Health Care Reform lead Frum to conclude [14] that "Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us and now we're discovering we work for Fox... [the] balance here has been completely reversed. The thing that sustains a strong Fox network is the thing that undermines a strong Republican party." At least one voice of restraint still remains in the Republican camp, however. John Cornyn (R-Tx), National Republican Senatorial Committee chair spoke out against a platform of complete repeal [15]. "There is non-controversial stuff here like the preexisting conditions exclusion and those sorts of things," Cornyn commented. "We are not interested in repealing that. And that is frankly a distraction." [1] http://www.flickr.com/photos/44550450@N04/4430849594 [2] http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/03/senate-gop-introduces-bill-to-repeal-new-health-care-law/1 [3] http://www.necn.com/03/23/10/McConnell-GOP-slogan-will-be-repeal-and-/landing.html?blockID=202926&feedID=4215 [4] http://thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.4903: [5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2010 [6] http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2010/0323/Attorneys-general-in-14-states-sue-to-block-healthcare-reform-law [7] http://iowaindependent.com/30343/conservatives-douth-path-to-health-reform-repeal [8] http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/24/virginia-governor-to-sign-law-firing-back-at-health-care-bill/?fbid=9RB7Hfs1gql [9] http://www.roanoke.com/news/breaking/wb/240770 [10] http://moneywatch.bnet.com/economic-news/blog/maximum-utility/why-we-need-an-individual-mandate-for-health-insurance/177/ [11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCulloch_v._Maryland [12] http://www.frumforum.com/waterloo [13] http://twitter.com/Talkmaster/status/10819572836 [14] http://rawstory.com/2010/03/frum-republicans-work-fox-news/ [15] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/23/nrscs-cornyn-we-wont-call_n_510232.html -
Gordon Brown and David Cameron in pre-Budget clash - UK Politics, UK - The Independent
[TweetMeme] (London - TweetMeme)Tory leader David Cameron accused Gordon Brown today of treating the nation like "fools" as he urged the Prime Minister to get on and call the general election.0 comments Source: www.independent.co.uk ...
Tory leader David Cameron accused Gordon Brown today of treating the nation like "fools" as he urged the Prime Minister to get on and call the general election.
0 comments Source: www.independent.co.uk
-
Let's Stop Reacting, Let's Start Planning
[Hypeads] (the-ad-pit)One thing that regularly pisses me off about adland and marketingworld is the amount of corporate and hyped up posturing that goes on. Adcontrarian pointed it out nicely in S&S's new video. [Note - The video itself is nicely done but suggests that we are all fixated with what we used to do rather than what we should do. A few slow thinkers aside we are Ad Agencies, not 'Passive Ad Agencies'] As an industry we are so good at overreacting with changes in the short term, and crawlingly slow at ...
One thing that regularly pisses me off about adland and marketingworld is the amount of corporate and hyped up posturing that goes on. Adcontrarian pointed it out nicely in S&S's new video. [Note - The video itself is nicely done but suggests that we are all fixated with what we used to do rather than what we should do. A few slow thinkers aside we are Ad Agencies, not 'Passive Ad Agencies']
As an industry we are so good at overreacting with changes in the short term, and crawlingly slow at changing in the long term. Every week an agency says they have a new way, the future of advertising, the new media outlook, the end of advertising, or some bollocks idea they rushed out to get headlines and only sounds half decent because they got their best copywriter to word it over their weekend.
It's like Gordon Brown promoting changes in the Labour Party by talking about David Cameron being the next Prime Minister. It is a futile and embarassing ironic attempt to avoid being seen as backward by declaring yourself archaic.
Either that or it is over the top hype mongering in the name of specialism. "TV is dead" say the digital specialists. "[insert tech idea] is the future" say unknown tech firm hoping to cash in. It's the upper market equivalent of SEO spambots. "Get to number one in google now!" 'Well, if you are that good why aren't you number 1 in google for 'SEO', and why are you spamming me??'
Let's not even get on to agencies proudly declaring their 'creative led' attitude that turns out to mean the creative is first in line for the axe when something goes wrong.
I get the feeling that there are agencies out there still so rattled by missing the initial influx of digital change that they are desperate to arrive first at the next big cultural shift. They seem happy to be wrong 400 times to be right once, which is never a good style for adland. "Oh yes, we know our last campaign was totally misguided but cloud sourced augmented reality truly is the new iPad app".
This industry is full to bursting with intelligent, charismatic, forward thinking people. We need to make use of them, develop properly instead of hyping up every new thought to an inch of credibility because we don't want to look like we are being left behind while other agencies float off in their hype bubble.
Let's stop reacting, let's start planning. -
Camera of representative, Olvany, New York This ...
[Q & A] (Recent Questions on Yedda)Camera of representative, Olvany, New York This is not a question, this is a matter of fact, Deborah Eilen and Sheila Rubin, started to put brain of the students at cs 152. Ms. Eidlen use to be the principal, and Ms. Rubin the assistant principal, once they put the student brain they start to bring into school Doctor, police officer, and all kind of people to see what these children brain can put. Ms. Eidlen retired but is doing it from her home. In the school site Sharon Delaney took her pl ...
Camera of representative, Olvany, New York
This is not a question, this is a matter of fact, Deborah Eilen and Sheila Rubin, started to put brain of the students at cs 152. Ms. Eidlen use to be the principal, and Ms. Rubin the assistant principal, once they put the student brain they start to bring into school Doctor, police officer, and all kind of people to see what these children brain can put. Ms. Eidlen retired but is doing it from her home. In the school site Sharon Delaney took her place.
By this method, they put the children in coma, them these dirty Doctor take the organism of these children and sale it to a worthy person. Some children die in the school without reason to thier parents.
The police officer are part of this crime by hidden the crime and touching thier private part or genital part and laughing like cracy.
Also Ms. Rubin and Ms. Eidlen have people to find out if the parent of these students are worthy, to robber their posetion, by open the door with a cumputer and has somebody in the school to monhitor them in case somebody come.
Since not body took action to stop the crime even tought a lot of people know it. Jose Ruiz and Irenes Rogan have a site of porno with the children of the public school of New York City.
For more information about this please contact the class of 2001-2002 of CS 152 at evergreen Avenue, Bronx, NY 10472.
To start, I have the list of the children graduete in 2001-2002, but I am going to put the class of worst teacher with themself-called program.
Mrs M. Walsh Class 5-317
Giavanni Blakney, Stefan Brown, Milagros Castillo, Gerardo Contreras, Lilliana Cruz, Johnathan Feliciano, Shaundale Gore, Edgar Guevara, Yolanda Harry, Esdaisy Hernandez, Angie Jimenez, Davon Keyes, David Lopez, Ava Louden, Carlos Matos Stephanie Medina, Christopher Melendez, Ludwig Miranda, Destiny Oliver, Jonathan Ortiz, Garry Ramirez, Caycha Scott, Simone Smalls, Christopher Toala, Nolann Tyreli, Ramel Walsh.
These Children, today day are young people, but some of them have knowledge of this program or crime.
I am not longer in NYC but I also am a victim of this program.
Yours,
Lucila Borbon
Topics: social science, this is not a question, this is a call for help. -
MS Word Mail Merge with Silverlight 4 COM Automation
[RIA (Rich Internet Apps)] (SilverlightShow: Silverlight Community)One of the new Silverlight 4 features allows applications talking to native COM components through COM Automation classes. Perhaps one of the most interesting use case for this new COM interoperability feature in Silverlight LOB applications is interacting with locally installed Microsoft Office applications to work with their documents. This article will focus on creating a new MS Word document using Word’s mail merge feature. Mail merging lets user create a number of personalized documents u ...
One of the new Silverlight 4 features allows applications talking to native COM components through COM Automation classes. Perhaps one of the most interesting use case for this new COM interoperability feature in Silverlight LOB applications is interacting with locally installed Microsoft Office applications to work with their documents.
This article will focus on creating a new MS Word document using Word’s mail merge feature. Mail merging lets user create a number of personalized documents using pre-made templates. A template contains special placeholders (fields), which, in the process of mail merging, are populated with data from a structured data source.
Technologies, used for this article
The core of the sample application is of course Silverlight 4 and it’s automation features. WCF RIA Services will serve as a bridge between the server (where the data will be) and the client (application), while MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework) will serve as means of separating application components to be composed at runtime.
What are we going to build?
The sample application is about creating invitation cards to a child’s birthday. The birthday girl maintains a list of her friends in a database on a server and when her birthday is coming up, she updates the invitation template and picks the friends she’d like to have at the party. After a simple click on a button, a document, containing cards for all her friends, appear on the screen, ready to be printed.
The data
Rather than having a proper database on the server, this sample uses a simple sample data generator to create fake user data. Names and surnames are taken from www.namestatistics.com and paired randomly to avoid any unintentional reference to a real-world person.
1: public static class DataGenerator
2: {3: private static readonly Random Randomizer = new Random();
4:5: private static readonly string[] Names = new[] { "James", "John", "Robert", "Michael", "William", "David", "Richard", "Charles", "Joseph", "Thomas", "Mary", "Patricia", "Linda", "Barabara", "Elizabeth", "Jennifer", "Maria", "Susan", "Margaret", "Dorothy" };
6: private static readonly string[] LastNames = new[] { "Smith", "Johnson", "Williams", "Jones", "Brown", "Davis", "Miller", "Wilson", "Moore", "Taylor", "Anderson", "Thomas", "Jackson", "White", "Harris", "Martin", "Thompson", "Garcia", "Martinez", "Robinson" };
7:8: public static Person Create(int i)
9: {10: int nameIndex = Randomizer.Next(Names.Length);
11: return new Person
12: {13: Id = i,14: FirstName = Names[nameIndex],
15: LastName = LastNames[Randomizer.Next(LastNames.Length)],
16: Gender = (nameIndex < Names.Length / 2) ? Gender.Boy : Gender.Girl,
17: };18: }19: }The generator creates an instance of a simple Person class, which is declared as:
1: public class Person
2: {3: [Key]4: public int Id { get; set; }
5: public string FirstName { get; set; }
6: public string LastName { get; set; }
7: public Gender Gender { get; set; }
8: }The [Key] attribute over the Id property indicates that the Person class is going to take part in the RIA Services contract. I’m not going to dive into details on setting the Silverlight projects to use WCF RIA Services (and RIA Services in general) because that’s beyond the scope of this article; but at this point, I will include the domain service class, which is responsible for getting the data and exposing it on a server endpoint:
1: [EnableClientAccess]
2: public class PartyDomainService : DomainService
3: {4: public IEnumerable<Person> GetChildren()
5: {6: List<Person> children = new List<Person>();
7: for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
8: {9: children.Add(DataGenerator.Create(i));
10: }11: return children;
12: }13: }PartyDomainService is a simple custom DomainService having a single method that will create and return a [mocked] list of 10 children that our birthday girl keeps track of in her database and would like to see on her birthday party. If RIA Services are set correctly, PartyDomainService should get replicated in the client project – see the Generated_Code folder:
[Hint: to see the above folder/file, check the “Show All Files” option button in Solution Explorer]
Bringing in MEF
One good thing about client-generated RIA Services code is that all generated classes are partial, thus extendable. That means that developers can easily make any DomainContext class a MEF export by extending the generated class and decorating it with an appropriate Export attribute. All you need to be aware of when extending partial classes is to put the extending class into the same namespace as the generated class:
1: [Export]2: public partial class PartyDomainContext
3: {4: }Domain context will get imported into a MailMerge class, which is responsible for doing the actual data merging. Importing is done through constructor injection:
1: [ImportingConstructor]2: public MailMerge(PartyDomainContext dataContext)
3: {4: this.dataContext = dataContext;
5: }When composition happens, the MailMerge class, which itself is an export too, will be imported into the MainPageViewModel as a property import. This way, the ViewModel will automatically have access to the MailMerge class without having to instantiate it by itself.
Mail merging
Mail merging in MS Word requires two things – a template and a data source to fill it. But before we continue with the MailMerge class, let’s take a look at the birthday invitation template our young girl has put together in Word:
Note the underlined text on the top – Title, FirstName and LastName are MailMerge fields that were inserted into the template; these are meant to be replaced with actual data from our “database” and correlate to Person’s Gender, FirstName and LastName properties.
The princess saved the template into the My Documents folder where she’ll be able to pick it from later. Our next task is creating the data source, which is going to be another Word document with the data table inserted in it. And this Silverlight application will be the one that creates it!
Accessing local file system to create the data source
Trusted Silverlight 4 applications now have access to local file system which means they are allowed to read and write files in those special ‘My’ user folders (My Documents, My Pictures, …) without having to explicitly ask the user for those permissions. With templatePath being the full path to the template file, here’s how the name for data source document is chosen:
1: string myDocumentsFolder = Environment.GetFolderPath(Environment.SpecialFolder.MyDocuments);
2: string filename = Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(templatePath);
3: string dataFilePath = Path.Combine(myDocumentsFolder, filename + ".dat");
Running with elevated permissions, the application will be allowed to write to that file. The data source document won’t be created by our code, we’ll leave this to be done by Word.
Talking to Word
To instantiate the COM object, we’re required to call it by it’s name, and the syntax is very similar to what we were doing years ago with classic ASP or VB script. Except, this time it’s the AutomationFactory class that provides the CreateObject method:
1: dynamic wordApplication = AutomationFactory.CreateObject("Word.Application");
The dynamic keyword is new in C# 4 syntax and provides the late-binding mechanism we knew back in the VB6/COM days. You can also see the use of dynamic keyword as a shorter syntax for reflection, all serving the purpose of dynamic objects not being type checked during the compilation, but rather at run time only.
Using the dynamic keyword also means you don’t get any intellisense help in Visual Studio which subsequently means you’ll end up reading a lot of help files to understand the API on objects you’re working with. For example, try this Word method for opening a single document:
1: [application].Documents.Open(FileName, ConfirmConversions, ReadOnly, AddToRecentFiles, PasswordDocument,
2: PasswordTemplate, Revert, WritePasswordDocument, WritePasswordTemplate, Format,
3: Encoding, Visible, OpenConflictDocument, OpenAndRepair, DocumentDirection, NoEncodingDialog)
Not exactly the prettiest you’ve seen, right? Fortunately, all but the first parameter in the above method are optional and you can leave them out – C# 4 provided with yet another fine concept of having optional parameters in method calls. That means that instead of writing this:
1: dynamic document = wordApplication.Documents.Open(ref templatePath, ref missingValue, ref missingValue,
2: ref missingValue, ref missingValue, ref missingValue, ref missingValue, ref missingValue,
3: ref missingValue, ref missingValue, ref missingValue, ref missingValue, ref missingValue,
4: ref missingValue, ref missingValue, ref missingValue);
we can now simply write:
1: dynamic document = wordApplication.Documents.Open(templatePath);
Sweet!
To create the data source document, another method with 9 parameters has to be invoked. We only need to provide two of them, but they are a few parameters apart, so this is the best we can come up with:
1: document.MailMerge.CreateDataSource(templatePath, Missing.Value, Missing.Value, header);
If you’re tempted to use named parameters at this point – you can’t. Currently, named parameters are simply not supported in Silverlight COM Automation scenarios.
OK, we successfully created the data source document. Let’s open it and write some data into it. The Person collection is converted to the two-dimensional array, transforming some of the data to fit what’s needed for the template:
1: string header = "FirstName;LastName;Title";
2: IEnumerable<IEnumerable<string>> data = p.Entities.Select(person => new[]
3: {4: person.FirstName,
5: person.LastName,
6: person.Gender == Gender.Boy ? "prince" : "princess"
7: }.AsEnumerable());
Header string is used by the CreateDataSource for creating a table in the document. The array will be written to that same table as its data content:
1: dynamic table = dataDocument.Tables(1);
2:3: for (int i = 0; i < data.Count(); i++)
4: {5: dynamic row = i == 0 ? table.Rows(2) : table.Rows.Add();
6: InsertRow(row, data.ElementAt(i));
7: }Almost done! One last thing needed to be done is doing the actual merge:
1: document.MailMerge.Execute(false);
At this point, Word will take the template and the data source document, and if everything’s set up correctly, start creating a new page for every row in data source table.
It’s worth noting that COM Automation feature is only allowed with trusted application, and on systems that support it (currently that’s Windows only). To check if COM Automation is available to your code, check the following API:
1: bool isAutomationAvaliable = AutomationFactory.IsAvailable;
Also, in order to use the dynamic keyword, a project should include a reference to the Microsoft.CSharp.dll.
UI / Conclusion
The accompanying project includes a piece of UI, which will let our young princess select a Word template and process it with the data from the server. Please see other code in there as well as it provides the complete solution presented in this article.
Full source code of the project is available to download here.
COM Automation in Silverlight 4 is big because of all the opportunities it provides to the developer. Due to its nature, it currently only works when the application is deployed to a Windows OS, but Microsoft is investigating means for providing similar stories on other OS’s as well. Elevated permissions are required to use the Automation.
The article discussed a process of creating birthday invitations; you can use exactly the same concept for issuing invoices, for example. Microsoft Office integration has never been so exciting as it is now, with Silverlight leading the way.
-
Wednesday notes: NHL, players can't agree on new head shot rule
[Hockey] (On the Forecheck)While there's no Predators game tonight, it's a big night for hockey in Nashville nonetheless - head over to Dave & Busters at Opry Mills for 2 hours of hockey talk, with Paul McCann's Hockeybuzz Radio running from 6:00-7:00, and the weekly Predators Player Show going from 7:00-8:00. Joel Ward and Dustin Boyd will be this week's guests, and available for autographs. If you can't be there in person, tune into WNSR, 560-AM in Nashville to hear both shows. And now your morning news & notes, whi ...
While there's no Predators game tonight, it's a big night for hockey in Nashville nonetheless - head over to Dave & Busters at Opry Mills for 2 hours of hockey talk, with Paul McCann's Hockeybuzz Radio running from 6:00-7:00, and the weekly Predators Player Show going from 7:00-8:00. Joel Ward and Dustin Boyd will be this week's guests, and available for autographs.
If you can't be there in person, tune into WNSR, 560-AM in Nashville to hear both shows.
And now... your morning news & notes, which includes a regrettable squabble between the NHL and NHLPA over the imposition of a new head-shot rule.
First, this:
SB Nation is conducting a survey to learn more about our readers, and I'd appreciate your completing it by Thursday of this week. The blog which has the highest portion of its membership fill out the survey gets $500 to donate to the charity of its choice. Can we raise $500 for perhaps the Predators Foundation, folks?
Predators News
Preds Lulled to Sleep, Wake Up Seeing Stars " Pull My (Fang)Finger
AJ took in the game from an impromptu mini-blogger convention hosted by Mark from The View From 111.The View from 111: Dallas Drops the Predators 3-1
Mark wants to see the Preds put their hard hats back on and get to work...See Puck City: NHL Stars Of The Week Can't Handle The Ones From Dallas: Preds Lose 3-1
SPC looks ahead, not back, as two major Western Conference opponents are coming up next.Preds On The Glass: Game Recap: Dallas Ends Predators Streak with 3-1 Win
Buddy's recap, as usual, has all sorts of audio commentary from players and Coach Trotz after the game.Stellar Start to the 3rd Period Gives Dallas Stars 3-1 Win In Nashville - Brandon Felder
Brandon was almost lulled to sleep by the Stars tactics last night, as perhaps some of the Preds were as well.Inconsistent effort by Preds produces first loss in 12 days… | Section 303
Jeremy's impression was that the Preds started off each period slowly last night, taking a few shifts to get their game going.Predators victims of Dallas' defensive tactics - Nashville City Paper
David Boclair's recap includes an admission by Ryan Suter of a bad play that led to the winning goal for Dallas.Jason Arnott defends absence - The Tennessean
This is just a bizarre article - why should Arnott have to "defend" not playing last night?Around the NHL
Nothing new: NHL, NHLPA put politics above player safety - Puck Daddy
Something happened on the way to ratifying the new head-shot rule, as the players dig in their heels and the league then ignores them. Bizarre stuff...Down Goes Brown: The NHLPA's very good reasons for stalling on the headshot rule
DGB explains why the players are dragging their feet, which includes this: "We're still studying several detailed proposals from Chris Chelios, who for some reason seems really interested in protecting the player's brains. Their tasty, tasty brains."Leafs in the hunt for "Norwegian Hobbit" : Maple Leafs Hot Stove
Mats Zuccarello Aasen (5'7", 160 lbs.) impressed at the Olympics, and might have an NHL future ahead of him.Darcy Tucker Suspended For One Game By The NHL - SB Nation
Tucker has moved on from career-threatening knee shots to boarding defensemen from behind as they touch up an icing. Stay classy, Darcy.Greatest Hockey Legends.com: Red Wings Played Prison Hockey Team In 1954
The original Winter Classic? This is well worth your time reading...Steroid investigators visit Capitals after local doctor arrest - Puck Daddy
A story from last spring comes back around again. There's no fire yet, but just a bit of smoke...Patrice Bergeron Visits Injured 15-Year-Old Hockey Player In Atlanta Hospital - SB Nation
The Bruins forward checks in with a teenager who is recovering from a broken neck suffering during play.Capitals and Canucks Players Dominate NHL Plus-Minus - NHL Digest
Tyler notes that two teams are monopolizing the top 10 in the Plus/Minus stat. The question becomes, does a guy like Jeff Schulz (2nd at +36) ride the coattails of his teammates?Video: Volchenkov, refs are Enemies No. 1 for Philadelphia Flyers - Puck Daddy
I'm on the opposite end of the scale from Greg Wyshynski on this one. I agree with the Sportsnet commentary that Simon Gagne put himself at risk by turning his back to Anton Volchenkov as the Ottawa defenseman came in for a big hit along the boards. Check out the video here and judge for yourself:
-
Fallen Idol: Lacey Brown (American Idol Exit Interview) - TVStar.com Television News
[American Idol] (AMERICAN IDOL - Google News)KATU Fallen Idol: Lacey Brown (American Idol Exit Interview) TVStar.com Television News The energetic Lacey Brown hopped on the weekly American Idol conference call to talk about her decision to sing "Ruby Tuesday," her Idol downfall, Lacey Brown returns from American IdolConnectAmarillo.com powered by KVII Lacey Brown banters with David LettermanLos Angeles Times (blog) GATHER POLL: Who Will Be Voted Out Of The American Idol Top 11?Gather.com Examiner.com -PopStar.com Celebrity News ...

KATU
Fallen Idol: Lacey Brown (American Idol Exit Interview)
TVStar.com Television News
The energetic Lacey Brown hopped on the weekly American Idol conference call to talk about her decision to sing "Ruby Tuesday," her Idol downfall, ...
Lacey Brown returns from American IdolConnectAmarillo.com powered by KVII
Lacey Brown banters with David LettermanLos Angeles Times (blog)
GATHER POLL: Who Will Be Voted Out Of The American Idol Top 11?Gather.com
Examiner.com -PopStar.com Celebrity News -The Associated Press
all 152 news articles » -
UK Elections 2010: Who’ll Be In Charge In May?
[Women] (Parlour Magazine)Come May, one of these three men will be in charge of Britain. It’s election time, yay! The man on the left is our current Prime Minister, Labour’s Gordon Brown. The one in the middle is the Conservatives’ David Cameron, the one on the right is the Liberal Democrats’ Nick Clegg. Although Gordie hasn’t formally announced ...
Come May, one of these three men will be in charge of Britain. It’s election time, yay! The man on the left is our current Prime Minister, Labour’s Gordon Brown. The one in the middle is the Conservatives’ David Cameron, the one on the right is the Liberal Democrats’ Nick Clegg. Although Gordie hasn’t formally announced [...] -
First Cup: Wednesday
[NBA Basketball, Sports] (ESPN.com - TrueHoop)Benjamin Hochman of The Denver Post: "For Carmelo Anthony, this lone New York trip per season always has gravity -- he played college ball upstate at Syracuse, a lot of his family still lives in the New York area and, basically, this is the big stage. Melo scored a game-high 36 points, but after the game he was clearly affected by the loss -- he kept the New York media waiting nearly 40 minutes while he meticulously showered and dressed in the training room, digesting the reality of what happene ...
- Benjamin Hochman of The Denver Post: "For Carmelo Anthony, this lone New York trip per season always has gravity -- he played college ball upstate at Syracuse, a lot of his family still lives in the New York area and, basically, this is the big stage. Melo scored a game-high 36 points, but after the game he was clearly affected by the loss -- he kept the New York media waiting nearly 40 minutes while he meticulously showered and dressed in the training room, digesting the reality of what happened. When Anthony came out, he talked about the gall of Gallinari, who was trash-talking with the all-star. And he also discussed the not-so-ambiguous comments Knicks president Donnie Walsh made to the New York Post, suggesting that even though the Knicks have money to spend this summer, they are looking at rebuilding over the next couple years -- and Melo could be available after 2011. 'I really don't know what's going to happen the next year,' Anthony said. 'I don't know what's going to happen. But I don't see why anybody wouldn't want to play here in New York.' "
- Frank Isola of the New York Daily News: "The words Carmelo Anthony was directing toward Danilo Gallinari Tuesday night were, according to the Knicks' Italian-born forward, 'slang...English.' 'I was talking slang, too,' Gallinari added. It was a cocksure Gallinari who volunteered to defend Anthony and then took it upon himself in the third quarter to engage the Nuggets' All-Star forward in a game of I-can-top-that mixed in with a little friendly trash talk. ... The sold-out crowd immediately picked up he back-and-forth between Anthony and Gallinari, and the building was as alive as it has been all season. At one point, Gallinari turned to the crowd and let out a primal scream after hitting a three. Anthony, who could be seen telling point guard Chauncey Billups to get him the ball, scored 12 in the third quarter and tried to unnerve Gallinari by talking to him. Asked if he understood what Anthony was saying, Gallinari replied: 'Hell yeah.' 'That's basketball,' Gallinari said. 'Talking is a great part of basketball. If you don't talk in basketball you cannot play basketball. You've got to talk.' Anthony added: 'It was just friendly. Believe me it was just friendly. I was just competing. I like him. I like him a lot. I like him as a player and as a person. He's a nice person.' "
-
David Satriano and Fred Kerber of the New York Post: "On Monday, when Chris Lisi attends his next Nets game, he promises he won't
be wearing a bag. Lisi, 20, of Middletown, N.J., was the courtside fan who wore a brown paper bag over his head Monday night, prompting an angry exchange with Nets CEO Brett Yormark. Lisi and his brother, Rob, were sitting two rows from the court with some friends when Yormark approached them. 'At first I didn't know who he was, and he said he was the Nets president,' said Lisi, a former Nets season-ticket holder who works for a delivery service that counts among its customers Josh Boone. 'I thought, 'Wait, Rod Thorn is the president. He's lying.' He asked why I had the bag on, and I was sarcastic that the Nets were so good. Then he said something he shouldn't have.' The firestorm caused Yormark, normally regarded as one of the more fan-friendly execs, to issue a statement, claiming he was standing up for his players. Additionally, a spokesman said Yormark tried reaching out to Lisi throughout the day. He finally making contact last night. ... Devin Harris had his own take on Lisi's paper-bag antics. 'It could be the fact that we're moving to Newark next year,' he joked."
- Mary Schmitt Boyer of The Plain Dealer: "No one was happier to see Zydrunas Ilgauskas on Tuesday than Anderson Varejao. Grinning from ear to ear, Varejao bounded over to the mob of reporters at Cleveland Clinic Courts, who asked if he was excited to have Ilgauskas back. 'Yes, I am,' Varejao said. 'It was good to see him today. He didn't practice with us today. But he has been part of this team for a long time, and it was great to have him back. 'It was like when I go back home and see my mom and my dad. It was great to see him this morning.' Ilgauskas and Varejao have been close since the veteran center took the young power forward under his wing when Varejao arrived as a 22-year-old rookie from Brazil via Spain in fall 2004. 'Z was great to me, Varejao said. 'When I got here, I didn't speak any English. When we went to Columbus for the preseason, he used to order my food. He used to take me out to dinner and stuff like that. He took me basically as his son. He was great to me. All I can say is, 'Thank you, thank you' to him all the time.' "
- Paul Coro of The Arizona Republic: "Nothing has Phoenix looking more postseason ready than the play of Amar'e Stoudemire, who has expanded his offensive repertoire beyond the pick-and-roll and isolation game to show a more assertive and versatile look in the post. Golden State's Anthony Tolliver was helpless against him one on one, giving up 18 fourth-quarter points to Stoudemire, who missed only one shot in the final quarter Monday. 'You always want to develop your game,' Stoudemire said. 'Now in the post, there are more moves, whether it's face-up, back to the basket, right or left hand until they stop it. Then there's a need for a counter.' Stoudemire's transition dunk over Tolliver for a critical, tying 3-point play was proclaimed by many in the Suns locker room to be his finest slam ever. It even prompted Kelenna Azubuike to clutch a Golden State teammate once he saw Stoudemire rise over Tolliver from outside the lane. 'When J-Rich tossed me the ball, my first thought was, 'I hope he jumps,' ' Stoudemire said."
- Darnell Mayberry of The Oklahoman: "Kevin Durant’s face turned hard and his eyes welled up. He gazed straight ahead as he reflected on the man he affectionately referred to as 'Big Chucky.' Charles Craig was supposed to be by Durant’s side -- when he signed his letter of intent to Texas, continuing the basketball jones Craig first created, and when he sat in the Green Room on the night of the 2007 NBA Draft, eagerly counting down the final moments before he fulfilled his dream as the No. 2 overall pick. 'It just didn’t happen,' murmured a melancholy Durant last week. Craig was Durant’s first basketball coach. He died on April 30, 2005, in Laurel, Md., the victim of multiple gunshot wounds. He was 35. Since his freshman season at the University of Texas, Durant has worn jersey No. 35 in honor of Chucky. 'I just want as many people as I can to know why I wear it and the significance of the number,' Durant said. 'That’s my goal is to get him out there and keep his name alive.' "
- Charles F. Gardner of the Journal Sentinel: "If the Bucks can keep it going until the end of the regular season, the 46-year-old Skiles will be a leading candidate for coach of the year honors. Also considered a strong contender is Oklahoma City coach Scott Brooks, who has presided over a dramatic turnaround with a Thunder team that won only 23 games last season but already has 42 victories this season. Others in contention could be Utah's Jerry Sloan, Phoenix's Alvin Gentry and Charlotte's Larry Brown. 'Any time you've got a team that is picked last in their conference by every so-called expert, and with what he's got out of our team with no all-stars, I think he's definitely the coach of the year, not being biased,' said Bucks center Andrew Bogut. 'To be fair, I think it's down to Brooks and Skiles for coach of the year. I don't see anybody else really contending for that. When you compare rosters, they're probably the two best coaches.' "
- Ken Sugiura of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution: "How do you solve a problem like Dwight Howard? Three Orlando Magic beatings into the season, the Hawks are grasping for answers. They will try again Wednesday night at Philips Arena, where Orlando will attempt a season sweep and a seventh consecutive win over the Hawks in the final regular-season meeting between the two teams. 'I feel like we go into the game and we have a game plan, and then we get hit in the mouth and then everything gets thrown out the window,' said swingman Mo Evans. 'I feel like other teams play them well in our division,' center Al Horford said. 'We kind of have to figure out what works best for us.' Hawks fans know the drill. Led by Howard, the four-time All-Star center from Southwest Atlanta Christian Academy, the Magic have had the Hawks' number, and a few of their letters. The Magic's three wins over the Hawks this season have been by an average of 22.3 points."
- Mike Monroe of the San Antonio Express-News: "Gregg Popovich clearly understands that Manu Ginobili is nearly as important to the Spurs now as Tim Duncan was in 2000. The guard will be a free agent on July 1 unless the Spurs can present a contract extension he deems worthy of serious consideration. The situation isn't entirely analogous to 2000. Then, the arc of Duncan's future Hall of Fame career had just begun. Ginobili, nearing the end of his eighth season in silver and black, will turn 33 in May. With a game based as much on explosion as craftiness that befuddles opponents, no team is likely to offer more than four more seasons to a player whose legs likely have only three more great years. Nevertheless, with each Spurs victory sealed by an extraordinary Ginobili play, you can practically see the digit counters whirling on agent Herb Rudoy's calculator. Popovich knows how much better his team is with the real Ginobili, and he is too forthright to pretend otherwise for the sake of leverage."
- Mike McGraw of the Daily Herald: "Joakim Noah livened things up by grunting through an extra 15 minutes of cardio workouts, sprinting repeatedly up and down the court, sometimes dribbling a ball along the way. Once Noah sat down and caught his breath, he offered an interesting take on coach Vinny Del Negro’s ejection in the third quarter of Monday’s 98-88 win over Houston. 'Just try to win it for Vinny, man,' Noah said, using a mock intense voice. 'Kirky (Hinrich, presumably) said that on the court yesterday and everybody just started laughing. I thought it was pretty funny. ‘Come on guys, let’s do it for Vinny.’ I thought that was pretty funny.' Obviously, Noah is feeling better. He played 9 minutes on Saturday in Philadelphia and 12 minutes Monday against Houston. With a couple days off to improve his conditioning, it stands to reason his playing time will increase more than just two minutes on Thursday when Miami visits the United Center."
- Doug Smith of the Toronto Star: "One would think most of them could grasp the concept that working hard on defence is important regardless of the involvement level on the offensive end but, as the Raptors have shown untold times this season, that doesn't always happen. When they are involved offensively, they're more focused on defence. Those two concepts are not mutually exclusive, even if they should be. So, as they prepare for a crucial four-game stretch that could define this season, they fully admit that the fragile psyches need to be soothed or things could get ugly. The why isn't that important now. It's to be dissected and dealt with in the summer. They are at a critical point in the season: two home games against powerful opponents before two road games against teams in the same dogfight for playoff positions. They simply have to deal with the shortcomings, manage them and play better. And they always play better when there are more of them involved. That means moving the ball often and crisply, no one-pass, one-shot offensive sets. Get the ball inside and if there's nothing there kick it right back out and get it moving around the perimeter. Everyone's involved. Everyone's happy."
- Ira Winderman of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel: "It was midway through the fourth quarter of Monday's 99-89 victory. The New Jersey Nets had trimmed what had been a 12-point deficit to eight. The Miami Heat had committed turnovers on its previous two possessions. That's when Carlos Arroyo put up the stop sign. The veteran point guard dribbled in place in the backcourt, pounding the ball in a not-so-subtle message that the foolishness would now cease. It was the type of leadership moment that has been scarce from Heat point guards this season amid the team's revolving door at the position. 'I like it. He beat me to the punch,' coach Erik Spoelstra said. 'I was running off the bench to do the same thing, to pull the reins in, and he was already on the same page with that.' A rotation that has gone from Mario Chalmers to Arroyo to since-suspended Rafer Alston to Arroyo finally appears to have settled on a definitive leader. Monday that meant the rare opportunity to play all 12 fourth-quarter minutes, with no need to defer the game-closing ballhandling responsibilities to Dwyane Wade."
- Jody Genessy of the Deseret News: "The Utah Jazz don't need to take a glance at last year's results or re-read newspaper clippings from the end of the 2008-09 season as a refresher. Nope. No reminders are necessary, thank you. Even without pulling out the old scrapbook, they remember all too well what happened about this time last spring when the bottom fell out of what was looking to be a promising playoff run. This might, in fact, be a proud moment for their former history teachers because the Jazz are now set on learning from the past instead of watching it repeat itself. 'I think it's a big emphasis,' Deron Williams said of finishing strong. Last year, the Jazz doomed themselves to a first-round exit in Laker Land by dropping seven of their last nine games and eight of their final 12. And in 2007, they sputtered to a 4-7 record in the home stretch, making it all the harder to work their way to the Western Conference Finals."
- Filip Bondy of the New York Daily News: "We're getting down to the nitty-grisly. The Nets have a dozen games left, and maybe five of them are winnable. Two of those come at home this week, tonight against the Kings and then Friday vs. the Pistons. But, really, the Nets don't get measured anymore against Sacramento or Detroit. At 7-63, they are compared now to only those dilapidated 1972-73 Sixers, who finished at 9-73 and have stood for nearly four decades as a symbol of noble NBA failure. So we ask: Who would win, if these two storied, sorry sides were transported in a time capsule and met on a neutral court in Princeton? Those Sixers were mostly old guys at the end of sometimes glorious careers. These Nets are mostly young guys starting out. That only makes for a better contrast."
- Barry Jackson of The Miami Herald: "Considering how great Dwyane Wade is, here's a surprising stat: Wade is shooting 34.5 percent in the final five minutes of close games this season (when the Heat is leading or trailing by seven points or fewer), compared with 46 percent for LeBron James, 39.8 for Kevin Durant and 38.3 for Kobe Bryant. Wade shot 44 percent in those late-game situations last season. One factor: Wade is shooting more jumpers in those situations than in 2008-09. But Wade (and James and Bryant) get to the line much more late in close games than at other times."
-
Budget 2010: Labour has run out of steam, says David Cameron
[Guardian] (Politics: David Cameron | guardian.co.uk)• Only a post-election Conservative budget can get economy growing again, claims Tory leader • Follow Andrew Sparrow's budget liveblog hereDavid Cameron said today that the Labour government had "run out of steam" and only a post-election Conservative budget could get the economy growing again.The Tories staged a stunt outside their party HQ in Millbank, central London, today, as Alistair Darling prepared to deliver his final budget before the election.A line of masks featuring the faces of ...
• Only a post-election Conservative budget can get economy growing again, claims Tory leader
• Follow Andrew Sparrow's budget liveblog hereDavid Cameron said today that the Labour government had "run out of steam" and only a post-election Conservative budget could get the economy growing again.
The Tories staged a stunt outside their party HQ in Millbank, central London, today, as Alistair Darling prepared to deliver his final budget before the election.
A line of masks featuring the faces of Gordon Brown and his cabinet were held out of the windows of two black cabs. Red banners on the sides of the vehicles read, "£857.5bn debt" and, "a future fare for all".
Leaving his west London home by bicycle this morning, Cameron told Sky News: "The choice is between a government which has completely run out of steam, completely run out of ideas, is not being honest about the mess we're in and has got no plans to clear it up, and a Conservative party that's got the energy, the dynamism, the leadership to get the economy moving again.
"That's what we need, is to get this economy growing, get things going again. And that's what our budget will do straight after the election."
Despite the Tory leader's confidence, an Ipsos-Mori poll for the Mirror put the Conservatives on their lowest rating for two years. Among those certain to vote, 35% said they would vote Conservative. Labour was on 30% and the Lib Dems on 21%.
If the results were replicated at a general election Labour would be the biggest single party but would fall short of an overall majority.
The shadow chancellor, George Osborne, came third when people were asked who would be the most capable chancellor, with 21%. Darling scored 23% while the Lib Dems' Vincent Cable scored 32%.
The poll also indicated support for Labour's policy of not cutting the budget deficit as quickly as the Conservatives. Asked whether they thought the Labour position that the deficit should not be cut too soon as it "may stop an economic recovery", or the Conservative stance that "national debt is the greatest threat to the economy", was right, 56% said they agreed with the Labour, while 32% said the Tories were right.
Labour released a poster today designed to capitalise on Osborne's perceived unpopularity, lampooning him as "Boy George". The party said the poster was designed to highlight Osborne's "inexperience and opportunism".
"What is clear is that on the global downturn and on securing the recovery, George Osborne doesn't have a coherent or credible economic plan. He doesn't even know where to start," said a Labour spokesman.
"He can't say how much he would cut in 2010. He can't say how quickly he would halve the deficit. He can't say by how much he would reduce the structural deficit over a parliament. On those three basic questions he has got no answers."
The Conservatives launched their own poster featuring Brown in a dinner jacket and Darling in a wedding dress, with the film parody slogan "My Big Fat Greek Budget" to remind voters of their claim that Britain faces a Greek-style crisis if it does not get its debt levels down.
Explaining this morning's stunt outside Conservative party HQ, Greg Hands, a shadow Treasury minister, said Labour had "ruined the British economy, racked up an enormous amount of debt and are now mired in sleaze as well".
"It's a comment on what happened earlier this week in relation to 'lobbygate' but we are drawing a wider analogy that this government has really run out of steam," he added.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds -
Gordon Brown and David Cameron in pre-Budget clash
[News] (The Independent - Frontpage RSS Feed)Tory leader David Cameron accused Gordon Brown today of treating the nation like "fools" as he urged the Prime Minister to get on and call the general election.
Tory leader David Cameron accused Gordon Brown today of treating the nation like "fools" as he urged the Prime Minister to get on and call the general election.
-
Everton duo pitch up for Motherwell trials
[Soccer] (tribalfootball.com)Motherwell have handed trials to Everton duo Anton Peterlin and Cody Arnoux. <!--break--> The American pair were part of a Motherwell XI who beat Celtic Reserves at Lennoxtown on Tuesday. Well boss Craig Brown told the club's official web site: "The two lads from Everton coped well, particularly Cody, who led the line and caused them problems. "David Moyes is probably going to have to recall Lukas Jutkiewicz at the end of the season so we're taking a look at these lads to see if they're w ...
Motherwell have handed trials to Everton duo Anton Peterlin and Cody Arnoux.
<!--break-->
The American pair were part of a Motherwell XI who beat Celtic Reserves at Lennoxtown on Tuesday.Well boss Craig Brown told the club's official web site: "The two lads from Everton coped well, particularly Cody, who led the line and caused them problems.
"David Moyes is probably going to have to recall Lukas Jutkiewicz at the end of the season so we're taking a look at these lads to see if they're worth a shout."
-
Lacey Brown returns from American Idol - ConnectAmarillo.com powered by KVII
[American Idol] (AMERICAN IDOL - Google News)KATU Lacey Brown returns from American Idol ConnectAmarillo.com powered by KVII Lacey finished 12th in the hit show American Idol. Last few days have been a whirl wind for Lacey, she appeared on The Ellen Degeneres Show, Wendy Williams, Fallen Idol: Lacey Brown (American Idol Exit Interview)TVStar.com Television News GATHER POLL: Who Will Be Voted Out Of The American Idol Top 11?Gather.com Lacey Brown banters with David LettermanLos Angeles Times (blog) PopStar.com Celebrity News -Examiner.com ...

KATU
Lacey Brown returns from American Idol
ConnectAmarillo.com powered by KVII
Lacey finished 12th in the hit show American Idol. Last few days have been a whirl wind for Lacey, she appeared on The Ellen Degeneres Show, Wendy Williams, ...
Fallen Idol: Lacey Brown (American Idol Exit Interview)TVStar.com Television News
GATHER POLL: Who Will Be Voted Out Of The American Idol Top 11?Gather.com
Lacey Brown banters with David LettermanLos Angeles Times (blog)
PopStar.com Celebrity News -Examiner.com -The Associated Press
all 152 news articles »


