Rockford Register Star. March 30, 2011.
Underage drinking is a serious matter
About 700,000 middle schoolers drank alcohol in the past month. They didn't get the booze from the corner store; they didn't fool the bartender. Nearly half of them got it from home; 16 percent got it from a parent or guardian.
That was the sorry news in a report released in February by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
But here's encouraging news: Communities such as Rockford are taking the problem seriously.
Recently, a citywide partnership started a campaign, "Project Sticker Shock," designed to reach adults who might purchase alcohol and provide it to minors. Teens and adult volunteers will place warning stickers on alcohol packages listing the penalties for buying alcohol for underage people.
Locally, it's sponsored by the Rockford Alcohol Free Teens Coalition, in partnership with the city of Rockford Human Services Department and the Mayor's Youth Advisory Council. Statewide, it's part of a campaign by the Illinois Liquor Control Commission.
According to the commission, selling or providing alcohol to a minor can bring a $2,500 fine. A teen could get six months in jail if found with alcohol in a public place. A parent or guardian could spend up to a year in jail for allowing underage drinking at his or her home.
These are hefty fines and stiff punishment. Still, the problem persists.
SAMHSA's latest national survey shows 27.6 percent of people 12 to 20 years old drank alcohol in the past month. The prevalence and the consequences were no less serious in this area.
Addiction to alcohol was the No. 2 reason adolescents sought treatment in 2009, said Judy Emerson, director of communications for Rosecrance Health Network.
Often, it starts with an innocent-sounding premise: that parents, or people 21 or over, will "help" minors get used to drinking under supervision, rather than leaving the minors to do it on their own.
The problem is, a habit of drinking — developed early — puts kids at tremendous risk for alcohol dependency.
A recent article in The Wall Street Journal pointed out, alcohol can do long-term harm to developing brains in regard to planning, decision-making and impulse control.
Then there's the risk for underage drinkers getting behind the wheel and injuring themselves or others.
So, when you see the warning stickers at businesses around Rockford, pay attention. Chances are, they were put there by someone younger and wiser.
___
Chicago Sun-Times. April 3, 2011.
Share the pain in workers comp plan
We've been listening to businesses in Illinois complain about the state's workers' compensation system for so long that our ears are at risk of developing repetitive stress syndrome.
But now, in a welcome move, Gov. Quinn is pushing a reform plan that promises to bring down the costs of workers' comp while protecting the rights of workers. The details may shift and change as Quinn's proposal works its way through the Legislature, but his fundamental approach is sound — every interest group must share in the pain. This is one reform that must be seen through to completion.
The problems are clear. The premiums Illinois companies pay for workers comp insurance are significantly higher than in many other states, and the fees paid to medical providers through workers comp are the second highest in the nation. Many businesses pay more for workers comp insurance than they do in state income taxes.
High workers comp costs are a disincentive to set up a business in Illinois — or to stay in business here. As Caterpillar CEO Doug Oberhelman said in a March 21 letter to Quinn, Illinois must take big steps to improve its image as business-friendly.
How much of a mess is our state's workers comp system? Consider that a majority of employees at one Downstate prison, the Menard Correctional Center, have applied for, or already have received, workers comp disability payments.
As the Belleville News-Democrat has reported, more than $10 million has been paid to 389 prison employees since 2008.
It's time to get real or watch businesses say goodbye.
But while easing the onerous burden of workers comp for employers, it's every bit as important to protect the benefits, rights and quality health care for legitimately injured workers. And the rules must be strict enough to encourage employers to provide safe workplaces.
It's also important not to simply slash fees paid to medical providers without reforms elsewhere in the system. Because workers comp cases require substantially more paperwork and review by doctors and hospitals — and payment is sometimes held up for years — the best medical providers would drop out of the system that reduced payments too much.
Quinn's proposal, which retains some elements of a bill that failed in the previous legislative session, is a thoughtful effort to navigate a complicated problem and to spread the pain among various stakeholders.
Insurance companies will be asked to institute cost-saving electronic billing, as is done in some other states, and to pay more promptly. Medical providers will be asked to accept a reduction in fees.
Employers who fail to maintain proper insurance coverage will face a crackdown. Labor will be asked to accept caps on some payments for some medical conditions, such as for carpal tunnel syndrome disability.
The proposal also calls for restructuring the Workers' Compensation Commission and imposing ethical standards to guard against decisions that consistently favor either employers or workers.
Reducing the medical fee schedule would trim costs right away, but reforms in the way cases are adjudicated will take longer to produce savings. And the financial failure of a previous revamping of workers comp, in 2005 and 2006, reminds us just how tough it will be to get this thorny issue right.
Jerry Stermer, a senior adviser to Quinn, characterizes this plan as one that gives everybody a haircut but doesn't scalp anyone.
That's easily and obviously the best approach. Or nothing will get done.
___
The (Bloomington) Pantagraph. April 1, 2011.
Online police filing a worthy initiative
With government budgets stretched thin, it's more important than ever to make the best use of existing resources — and to take advantage of any efficiencies to be gained through today's electronic systems.
A good example of this is the Normal Police Department's new program that allows people to file police reports online for minor theft and property damage crimes.
Under the recently enacted initiative, residents can use the Internet to file reports of theft under $300, criminal damage to property under $300, lost property and graffiti. The system is intended for incidents in which there is no physical evidence, no injuries and no weapons involved.
As Chief Kent Crutcher told a Pantagraph reporter, "It's basically for reports with zero solvability" that generally are being made only for insurance purposes.
By making this switch, instead of having a police officer take a report in person, Crutcher estimates more than 1,200 hours of police time can be saved each year.
That time can be put to better use by having more police on patrol where they might be better able to prevent such crimes.
In addition, for people with easy access to the Internet, it will be more convenient for them to access a form and file a report at their convenience, rather than going to the police station or waiting for a police officer to come to their home or business.
Online reporting is optional. Those without computer access, or who would rather file a report with a police officer, can continue to meet with an officer.
The Bloomington Police Department reportedly is interested in a similar approach.
We commend the Normal Police Department on this innovative solution that reflects a more efficient and effective use of resources and adds convenience for residents.
___
The (Springfield) State Journal-Register. April 3, 2011
Thoroughly investigate UIS case
Two years ago, a scandal erupted at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign when the Chicago Tribune reported on the use of political clout to gain admission for students who might not get in on academics alone.
By the time the dust settled, the university's president had resigned, its board of trustees was replaced and Gov. Pat Quinn created the Admissions Review Commission to investigate the use of a secret system to admit politically connected applicants. The panel's report revealed an embarrassing tangle of internal communications as university officials at all levels tried to balance placating politicians while keeping the clout system out of public view.
"The University now finds itself in a full-fledged crisis purely of its own making," states the report, issued in August 2009. "Public confidence in the University and its leadership has eroded, and the University must set out in earnest to regain the public's trust and repair the damage done to its reputation."
The University of Illinois Springfield finds itself in much the same position. After exhausting every effort to conceal almost all details of an incident that led to the sudden resignations of two women's softball coaches two years ago, UIS now faces questions about whether it paid a $200,000 settlement to a student athlete to cover up a single incident on a team trip to Florida, a pattern of inappropriate behavior by a coach or both.
The settlement, incidentally, likely never would have become publicly known had it not been for a subpoena by the Illinois Attorney General's Office — prompted by a request by State Journal-Register reporter Bruce Rushton — that forced UIS to release documents to the attorney general that happened to include the settlement accord.
UIS's effort to keep information about the incident under wraps has been pursued on many fronts. It first cited various exemptions from the state Freedom of Information Act that allowed it to withhold information. When the attorney general's office rejected those claims, UIS cited federal law on student privacy as its license for secrecy.
The SJ-R recently filed suit against UIS to force the release of documents relating to the incident that precipitated the coaches' departures and the university's handling of their resignations. Two days after the lawsuit was filed, the university released parts of a letter from the attorney who negotiated the $200,000 settlement for the player. Allegations raised in that letter, we believe, must be addressed in a manner as swift, open and decisive as the one used in 2009 to expose and end the "clout list" in 2009 at U of I's main campus.
"As I assume you are aware .University of Illinois at Springfield softball coach Roy Gilmore assaulted a number of women who are members of the UIS softball team," attorney Lee Barron wrote. "This was not isolated aberrant behavior; a member of the UIS Athletic Department administrative team acknowledged after the incident that this conduct by Coach Gilmore was 'not surprising.'"
We hope the current U of I board of trustees and Gov. Quinn are paying attention here. It was the former board's obliviousness to — and, for some members, participation in — the clout affair that led to the seating of an entirely new board that includes former Springfield Mayor Karen Hasara. The current board's oversight mission is not limited to the admissions process in Urbana. It was the university's inability to police itself that led to Quinn forming an independent investigative commission.
This matter is no less serious than the clout scandal. It demands a public investigation no less thorough.
___










